Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Pistolshot

Mechanism? It says how He did it. He created the animals to reproduce ‘after their own kind’ not to reproduce ‘into different kinds’.


213 posted on 12/11/2009 12:12:21 PM PST by RoadGumby (Ask me about Ducky)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 210 | View Replies ]


To: RoadGumby; Pistolshot
The term "kind" has an interesting connotation in the original language. From men ~miyn, it means to "portion out", not necessarily species as many assume. At that, Strongs has an interesting commentary on it Groups of living organisms belong in the same created "kind" if they have descended from the same ancestral gene pool. This does not preclude new species because this represents a partitioning of the original gene pool. Information is lost or conserved—not gained. A new species could arise when a population is isolated and inbreeding occurs. By this definition a new species is not a new "kind" but a further partitioning of an existing "kind".

In other words, a more direct translation is that the term is that they share a common genetic ancestor. Like the phrase "the earth brought forth", the meaning could be a simple way of describing a far greater process than the limited language of the early writers could describe or understand.

221 posted on 12/11/2009 12:22:02 PM PST by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 213 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson