Sorry, no. Its the original article that I have been quoting.
From the article:
"We noticed that there had been very little degradation since it was originally fossilised about 18 million years ago, making it the highest quality soft tissue preservation ever documented in the fossil record"
Yes, by all means ignore the scientists who made the discovery, best to go with the safe ICR twisting of the news release so as not to challenge and pre-conceived notions.
After all, good science starts with a conclusion and works backwards, finding and twisting some facts and rejecting others all in the pursuit of supporting the pre-ordained conclusion, right?