(probably the same BS* website you just cut-and-pasted that creationist tripe from)
"The Miller-Urey experiment remains the subject of scientific debate. Scientists continue to explore the nature and composition of Earth's primitive atmosphere and thus, continue to debate the relative closeness of the conditions of the Miller-Urey experiment (e.g., whether or not Miller's application of electrical current supplied relatively more electrical energy than did lightning in the primitive atmosphere). Subsequent experiments using alternative stimuli (e.g., ultraviolet light) also confirm the formation of amino acids from the gases present in the Miller-Urey experiment. During the 1970s and 1980s, astrobiologists and astrophyicists, including American physicist Carl Sagan, asserted that ultraviolet light bombarding the primitive atmosphere was far more energetic that even continual lightning discharges. Amino acid formation is greatly enhanced by the presence of an absorber of ultraviolet radiation such as the hydrogen sulfide molecules (H2S) also thought to exist in the early Earth atmosphere.
Although the establishment of the availability of the fundamental units of DNA, RNA and proteins was a critical component to the investigation of the origin of biological molecules and life on Earth, the simple presence of these molecules is a long step from functioning cells. Scientists and evolutionary biologists propose a number of methods by which these molecules could concentrate into a crude cell surrounded by a primitive membrane."
Bonner, J. T. First Signals: The Evolution of Multicellular Development. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2000.
Lodish, H., et. al. Molecular Cell Biology. 4th ed. New York: W. H. Freeman & Co., 2000.
Kerridge J.F. "Formation and Processing of Organics in the Early Solar System." Space Sci Rev. 90(1999):275-88.
Miller SL, Urey HC, Oro J. "Origin of Organic Compounds on the Primitive Earth and in Meteorites." J Mol Evol. 9 (1976):59-72.
Diversion, ad hominem,....O.K. I am all of the bad things you can thing of....I am guilty. Now, will you answer my questions or continue to obfuscate?
What is the point you are making? Stanley Miller concluded in 1998 that "a high temperature origin of life involving these compounds (RNA bases) are unlikely (Miller and Levy, "The stability of the RNA Base; Shapiro, "A Simpler Origin of LIfe."Miller further concluded in the same publication that of the four bases cytosine has the shortest half-life even at low temperatures and raises the possibility tha the 'GC pair' may not have been used in the first genetic material." Miller himself refuted his own early experimentation....his words, not mine.