Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: xcamel
Now that wasn’t so hard.

LOL! If it's 'not so hard' why can't the exact chemical compounds be named?

Chain reactions occurred between what chemicals?

What triggered the reactions?

If the components were already there, why did protolife appear first?

What caused proto life turn into life?

What kind of 'life' did the protolife evolve into?

Can scientists reproduce this birth of life under controlled conditions?

----

Just a few simple questions need to be answered before conjecture can be accepted as a scientific fact, IMHO.

141 posted on 12/10/2009 1:27:35 PM PST by MamaTexan (If man evolved from apes, why do we still have apes?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies ]


To: MamaTexan

Give me a billion years, and I’m sure I can make something of it...

Oh wait.. the fossil and the geologic record bears it all out... what was I thinking..

You and GGG failed the same 6th grade science class, didn’t you...


147 posted on 12/10/2009 1:32:41 PM PST by xcamel (The urge to save humanity is always a false front for the urge to rule it. - H. L. Mencken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies ]

To: MamaTexan; xcamel
If it's 'not so hard' why can't the exact chemical compounds be named?

You mean like water (H2O), methane (CH4), ammonia (NH3), and hydrogen (H2) hit with electricity to produce amino acids which combine to form proteins?

CO2 → CO + [O] (atomic oxygen)
CH4 + 2[O] → CH2O + H2O
CO + NH3 → HCN + H2O
CH4 + NH3 → HCN + 3H2

152 posted on 12/10/2009 1:36:57 PM PST by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson