Posted on 12/10/2009 1:00:27 AM PST by calfit32
This is a microcosm of the whole nightmare of Bummercare.
Barbara Boxer is a Viagra antidote.
One fixes a medical problem and gives life, the other ROBS life.
Gee, nice comparison.
Lol!
Barbara Boxer is an abortion.
Even Juan Williams, who was one of Hannity’s panel members on Wed. night, indicated that the comparison of abortion vs. viagra by Boxer was totally wrong. ....Seems Juan is moving more toward the center as a result of spending so much time on Fox News. LOL
Wake up California, we need a change; it’s time to run Boxer right out of office –– three terms (18 years) is long enough!
Insurance should cover neither abortion nor Viagra.
LOL. Heretofore, I’ve always accused Boxer of being incapable of forming an original thought...lol.
Where are term limits when we really need them. It isn't right that 49 other states have to suffer because of this.
I say the same thing about Massachusettes and several other states whose voters continue to foist their incumbent senators and congressasshats on the rest of us decade after decade after decade.
Term limits are sorely needed. I completely agree with you.
Precisely.
Regardless of how convoluted and irrational Boxer’s views and statements are seen by most people on “our” side of the fence, it must be remembered ...her side won the day! Feinstein’s statement that public funding of abortions is “moral” regardless of how anyone feels about it is just as irrational. Their views and votes can be seen in the condition of the state in which they are elected.
As for term limits, they exist. They are simply called by another name - elections. As study after study has shown, people are fed up with those with whom they disagree but think their Representative in Congress is wonderful and keep re-electing them. Only when Boxer’s constituents decide to “term limit” her will things change. She represents the loony left fringe because her majority voting public constituents are the loony left. If she wants to stay in congress, she is dedicated to represent the majority voting loony left that puts her there term after term.
This is the same LAME argument they use to justify convienience baby-killing. Using the phrase "right to choose", instead of "abortion", they consider pregnancy not the result of a willful act of gratification/entertainment, but rather a "health right" to convieniently kill the offspring. A man's voluntary decision to use medication has NOTHING to do with "health", but is another one of the "for fun" choices made.
Baby-killing for convienience has become beaten into people's heads as a "right to choose", but murdering an inconvienient adult is punishable.....
This country's values have been corrupted by YEARS of propoganda, and was purely created as a wedge to gain the female vote (right-to-choose).
If you are going to make this analogy, how do you explain that Viagra makes men feel good but abortion depresses most women?
Most don't cover Viagra.
The Medicare Part D drug formulary does not.
Barbara needs to return to school and learn about the birds and the bees...among other things.
Liberalism is a mental illness. Boxer is an example of an advanced and incurable case.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.