Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Still Thinking
Hmmmmm...

[I]t is clearly stated “Firearms Freedom Act “ supporters have never planned to test these laws in criminal cases, and no one who puts himself in that situation should expect support from the NRA.

It was my understanding that Montana had planned from the gitgo to take the FFA to feral court after passage. I presume their intention would be to give current and prospective manufacturers legal cover to begin business. At least in one instance I can understand the NRA's reticence though: If the States are successful in implementing FFA, it would probably leave the NRA with a much smaller national following. The States will have accomplished what the NRA could never hope to do -- or they would have done it a long time ago...

27 posted on 12/09/2009 9:31:36 PM PST by ForGod'sSake (You have two choices and two choices only: SUBMIT or RESIST with everything you've got!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: ForGod'sSake

Follow the money. The NRA is a lobbying group. If your cause is fixed...goodbye money.

March of Dimes is an excellent example.


28 posted on 12/09/2009 9:39:39 PM PST by 1010RD (First Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: ForGod'sSake

The NRA is taking a pass on a single lawsuit. How many dozens of lawsuits does the NRA have to be involved with before you notice?

There is no longer a gun ban in Morton Grove, Illinois. Thank you, NRA.


33 posted on 12/10/2009 2:17:07 PM PST by Shooter 2.5 (NRA /Patron - TSRA- IDPA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson