Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: NoObamaFightForConservatives

I believe it is illegal for a regulatory agency to alter its “regulations” in any significant manner without submitting those regulations for approval to the Legislature. This is standard language in laws creating regulatory agencies to prevent the executive branch from superseding the legislature’s role.

Does any attorney familiar with the statutes creating the EPA know if these clauses are included in the statutes?


3 posted on 12/09/2009 12:50:46 PM PST by coconutt2000 (NO MORE PEACE FOR OIL!!! DOWN WITH TYRANTS, TERRORISTS, AND TIMIDCRATS!!!! (3-T's For World Peace))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: coconutt2000
just ask the ACLJ,

its called the interstate commerce clause. It is interpreted to usurp everything else in the constitution.

IE , the constitution is redundant

11 posted on 12/09/2009 1:01:42 PM PST by KTM rider ( ..........tell me this really isn't happening ! !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: coconutt2000
just ask the ACLJ,

its called the interstate commerce clause. It is interpreted to usurp everything else in the constitution.

IE , the constitution is redundant

12 posted on 12/09/2009 1:01:47 PM PST by KTM rider ( ..........tell me this really isn't happening ! !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: coconutt2000
If Obama attempts to surrender our national sovereignty to an unelected bureaucracy at Copenhagen, which is openly known to be based on junk science which is founded on fraudulent data, he knows that he will undermine our economic health, military strength and standard of living, while forcing us to pay taxes to an unelected, global body where we are not represented. He knows he will be bypassing the required legislative process as defined in the U.S. Constitution, therefore trampling our guaranteed liberties and rights as citizens of the United States and protected by the U.S. Constitution. Based on the definitions as stated, I believe Obama will meet most of the definitions for treason.

Treason, as defined in Dictionary.com, is 1. The offense of acting to overthrow one’s government or to harm or kill its sovereign. 2. A violation of allegiance to one’s sovereign or to one’s state. 3. The betrayal of a trust or confidence; breach of faith; treachery., as defined at


29 posted on 12/09/2009 1:47:17 PM PST by Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson