Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: hellbender
Another bad amendment was the one providing for direct popular election of Senators.

There were good reasons for the amendment. Basically the senate was in the hands of the various states' political machines. There were a number of bribery scandals--it's easy to buy a senate seat when you only need to swing a handful of votes in a state house. And by the time the amendment passed, the majority of states, on their own, had already gone to some form of a direct election system.

30 posted on 12/08/2009 3:53:12 PM PST by Bubba Ho-Tep ("More weight!"--Giles Corey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: Bubba Ho-Tep
And you think there's no corruption in election of Senators any more? Think Illinois, Massachusetts...

Why even have 2 legislative bodies if both a popularly elected? The Founders knew what they were doing. The U.S. was to be a federation of sovereign States. That's why they gave tiny States 2 Senators, the same as much more populous States. Indirect election was an important part of Federalism (now almost dead), and part of the reason we had a republic, not a democracy.

37 posted on 12/08/2009 4:04:03 PM PST by hellbender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson