Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Rummyfan
Why would she run third party when she could easily capture the GOP nomination?

That's simple.

Many of the 40% self-identified conservatives in the electorate are independents or Democrats.

At least half of THEM (more where I live) hate the GOP brand so much that having that nomination would be a deal-breaker.

Sarah Palin's fraction of the non-GOP conservative vote would be greatly increased if she runs as a non-Republican.

54 posted on 12/08/2009 10:21:34 AM PST by Jim Noble (Hu's the communist?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: Jim Noble; Rummyfan
Many of the 40% self-identified conservatives in the electorate are independents or Democrats. At least half of THEM (more where I live) hate the GOP brand so much that having that nomination would be a deal-breaker. Sarah Palin's fraction of the non-GOP conservative vote would be greatly increased if she runs as a non-Republican.

That doesn't make any sense what so ever. All 49 "third parties" together gained a total of less than one half, of one percent of the vote last year.

There isn't a winning mass of Democrat and Independent conservatives waiting to vote against the GOP by voting for yet another conservative "Third Party" candidate which exist in every election, including the 2008 election when Alan Keyes got fewer than 48,000 votes.

Palin running "third party" would merely guarantee Obama reelection and a chance for the Democrats to shift funds to the congressional and senate races instead of having to fight for the presidency.

72 posted on 12/08/2009 10:48:47 AM PST by ansel12 (They don't come any slimier than Romney, (in the Republican party))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson