Skip to comments.
Audio: Palin hinting at 3rd-party run?
Hot Air ^
| 12/8/09
| Ed Morrissey
Posted on 12/08/2009 9:44:37 AM PST by Lou Budvis
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-136 next last
It's pretty obvious in Going Rogue that SP hates the GOP establishment, but I see this as more of a threat to get its act together.
To: Lou Budvis
Palin hinting at 3rd-party run?Good luck with all that!
2
posted on
12/08/2009 9:46:47 AM PST
by
dfwgator
To: Lou Budvis
She’s too smart to go 3rd party.
3
posted on
12/08/2009 9:47:16 AM PST
by
evad
(It's A Mont Thing)
To: Lou Budvis
It would virtually guarantee another four years of Democrat socialism by splitting the vote. Hope she doesn’t do it.
4
posted on
12/08/2009 9:47:21 AM PST
by
Nachum
(The complete Obama list at www.nachumlist.com)
To: Lou Budvis
Right - a third party run re-elects Barry 0. I don’t see anything about her that would want that to happen.
5
posted on
12/08/2009 9:47:28 AM PST
by
GOPsterinMA
("Henceforth, you shall be known as...'Nobel Obama'".)
To: Lou Budvis
Great. Insure BHO’s re-election. Glad Ronald Reagan didn’t think that way. After he lost the Republican primaries in 1976, he came back in 1980 and did it the right way. He wasn’t a spoiled sport.
To: Lou Budvis
I hope, for the country's sake, she thinks this through long and hard. I don't think the majority of Americans is ready for a third party (although most of us wish we had something other than what we have). I'm extremely concerned that a third-party run would pretty much assure another 4 years of our current administration — I know it's in God's hands, but I truly fear the result.
To: Lou Budvis
8
posted on
12/08/2009 9:51:41 AM PST
by
AuntB
(If Al Qaeda grew drugs & burned our forests instead of armed Mexican Cartels would anyone notice?)
To: Lou Budvis
if she does that she will probably get a position in the next Obama term as reward for being the straw man
honestly any third party from the right is just going to equal more Dem dominance
then i will have to hear people on this site whine about how terrible the Dems are while they contribute to Dem dominance with these asinine third parties
9
posted on
12/08/2009 9:51:42 AM PST
by
DM1
To: Welcome2thejungle
"After he lost the Republican primaries in 1976, he came back in 1980 and did it the right way. He wasnt a spoiled sport." Don't forget '68. He was Nixon's primary conservative rival - and near the end, the only legitimate rival. Reagan easily could have come back in '72 as a third party candidate, but as you point out, he didn't. In fact, he campaigned vigorously and patiently, and built his resume, for 12 years after 1968 to finally reach the spot where he could win, and he was a better candidate because of it.
10
posted on
12/08/2009 9:52:42 AM PST
by
OldDeckHand
(Obamacare - So bad, even Joe Lieberman isn't going to vote for it.)
To: Lou Budvis
The mere mention of a "third party" has the left going, "Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, and get the shredder ready for the Constitution."
After such fiaco, zero will be back in, and the coup will begin, in ernest.
Third parties are like secrets; three people can keep a secret if two of them are dead.
11
posted on
12/08/2009 9:53:09 AM PST
by
FrankR
(SENATE: You cram it down our throats in '09, We'll shove it up your ass in '10...count on it.)
To: FrankR
12
posted on
12/08/2009 9:54:09 AM PST
by
FrankR
(SENATE: You cram it down our throats in '09, We'll shove it up your ass in '10...count on it.)
To: Lou Budvis
Anyone who refuses to vote for her if she does go third party has proven themselves to be GOP Firsters.
13
posted on
12/08/2009 9:54:11 AM PST
by
Eagle Eye
(3%)
To: Welcome2thejungle
We could always run the old fashioned way - keep our heads low & count on public disgust with the deomcrats - and once we've won we can continue the 'same but slower' leadership that's worked so well for the party since Reagan.
No thanks. Our only chance is to give a very loud wake-up call for the poltroons in the GOP.
14
posted on
12/08/2009 9:54:18 AM PST
by
skeeter
To: Lou Budvis
Why not?
What has she got to lose?
She has no vested peronal interest in anything that I can see, she can retire wealthy back to Alaska if she doesn’t win. Why not run as an independent?
Nothing to lose and everything to gain. She’s in an enviable place.
15
posted on
12/08/2009 9:54:20 AM PST
by
Lorianne
To: FrankR
I hope Sarah goes 3rd party.
16
posted on
12/08/2009 9:55:05 AM PST
by
Scythian
To: Lou Budvis
All Palin is doing is reminding the GOP that they cant take generic unhappiness with the current Congress and administration for granted and just offer business as usual and thats helpful indeed.
I agree. IF the GOP gives us another RINO candidate, well then, they are the ones who went 3rd party.
To: evad
It’s up to the republican party. I won’t vote RINO again.
No Huck, no Romney, no Newt, and I could go on and on.
I’m done, they gave me the “If you don’t vote for McCain you elect Obama” line last time, well guess what, I voted Palin, which was still a vote for the Rino McCain and we still got Obama....
I will vote for Palin, Hunter or Demint. I will consider others, but I won’t vote Rino again.
18
posted on
12/08/2009 9:55:50 AM PST
by
Robbin
(If Sarah isnÂ’t welcome, IÂ’m not welcome, itÂ’s just that simpleÂ…)
To: OldDeckHand
If Palin lost the nomination I think she would back the nominee, but I truly believe that no matter what she would say, that if its a RINO people like me will not vote...I’m done playing that game.
The lesser of two evils is still evil and I’d rather get the revolution over with at that point.
19
posted on
12/08/2009 9:56:17 AM PST
by
MNlurker
To: DM1
I don’t think so.
Enough people are fed up with Republicans.
However, even if you’re right, Ms. Palin has nothing to lose by running as a 3rd Party candidate. The GOP was stupid to let that situation develop.
20
posted on
12/08/2009 9:56:31 AM PST
by
Lorianne
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-136 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson