Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Audio: Palin hinting at 3rd-party run?
Hot Air ^ | 12/8/09 | Ed Morrissey

Posted on 12/08/2009 9:44:37 AM PST by Lou Budvis

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-136 next last
It's pretty obvious in Going Rogue that SP hates the GOP establishment, but I see this as more of a threat to get its act together.
1 posted on 12/08/2009 9:44:38 AM PST by Lou Budvis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Lou Budvis
Palin hinting at 3rd-party run?

Good luck with all that!

2 posted on 12/08/2009 9:46:47 AM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lou Budvis

She’s too smart to go 3rd party.


3 posted on 12/08/2009 9:47:16 AM PST by evad (It's A Mont Thing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lou Budvis

It would virtually guarantee another four years of Democrat socialism by splitting the vote. Hope she doesn’t do it.


4 posted on 12/08/2009 9:47:21 AM PST by Nachum (The complete Obama list at www.nachumlist.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lou Budvis

Right - a third party run re-elects Barry 0. I don’t see anything about her that would want that to happen.


5 posted on 12/08/2009 9:47:28 AM PST by GOPsterinMA ("Henceforth, you shall be known as...'Nobel Obama'".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lou Budvis

Great. Insure BHO’s re-election. Glad Ronald Reagan didn’t think that way. After he lost the Republican primaries in 1976, he came back in 1980 and did it the right way. He wasn’t a spoiled sport.


6 posted on 12/08/2009 9:47:44 AM PST by Welcome2thejungle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lou Budvis
I hope, for the country's sake, she thinks this through long and hard. I don't think the majority of Americans is ready for a third party (although most of us wish we had something other than what we have). I'm extremely concerned that a third-party run would pretty much assure another 4 years of our current administration — I know it's in God's hands, but I truly fear the result.
7 posted on 12/08/2009 9:47:59 AM PST by Constitutions Grandchild
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lou Budvis

Listen to Palin’s interview with Lars.

http://www.larslarson.com/pg/jsp/charts/streamingAudioMaster.jsp?dispid=362&headerDest=L3BnL2pzcC9tZWRpYS9mbGFzaHdlbGNvbWUuanNwP3BpZD0xNjcyMyZwbGF5bGlzdD10cnVlJmNoYXJ0dHlwZT1jaGFydCZjaGFydElEPTM2MiZwbGF5bGlzdFNpemU9MzA=


8 posted on 12/08/2009 9:51:41 AM PST by AuntB (If Al Qaeda grew drugs & burned our forests instead of armed Mexican Cartels would anyone notice?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lou Budvis

if she does that she will probably get a position in the next Obama term as reward for being the straw man
honestly any third party from the right is just going to equal more Dem dominance
then i will have to hear people on this site whine about how terrible the Dems are while they contribute to Dem dominance with these asinine third parties


9 posted on 12/08/2009 9:51:42 AM PST by DM1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Welcome2thejungle
"After he lost the Republican primaries in 1976, he came back in 1980 and did it the right way. He wasn’t a spoiled sport."

Don't forget '68. He was Nixon's primary conservative rival - and near the end, the only legitimate rival. Reagan easily could have come back in '72 as a third party candidate, but as you point out, he didn't. In fact, he campaigned vigorously and patiently, and built his resume, for 12 years after 1968 to finally reach the spot where he could win, and he was a better candidate because of it.

10 posted on 12/08/2009 9:52:42 AM PST by OldDeckHand (Obamacare - So bad, even Joe Lieberman isn't going to vote for it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Lou Budvis
The mere mention of a "third party" has the left going, "Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, and get the shredder ready for the Constitution."

After such fiaco, zero will be back in, and the coup will begin, in ernest.

Third parties are like secrets; three people can keep a secret if two of them are dead.
11 posted on 12/08/2009 9:53:09 AM PST by FrankR (SENATE: You cram it down our throats in '09, We'll shove it up your ass in '10...count on it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FrankR

fiaco = fiasco


12 posted on 12/08/2009 9:54:09 AM PST by FrankR (SENATE: You cram it down our throats in '09, We'll shove it up your ass in '10...count on it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Lou Budvis

Anyone who refuses to vote for her if she does go third party has proven themselves to be GOP Firsters.


13 posted on 12/08/2009 9:54:11 AM PST by Eagle Eye (3%)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Welcome2thejungle
We could always run the old fashioned way - keep our heads low & count on public disgust with the deomcrats - and once we've won we can continue the 'same but slower' leadership that's worked so well for the party since Reagan.

No thanks. Our only chance is to give a very loud wake-up call for the poltroons in the GOP.

14 posted on 12/08/2009 9:54:18 AM PST by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Lou Budvis

Why not?
What has she got to lose?

She has no vested peronal interest in anything that I can see, she can retire wealthy back to Alaska if she doesn’t win. Why not run as an independent?

Nothing to lose and everything to gain. She’s in an enviable place.


15 posted on 12/08/2009 9:54:20 AM PST by Lorianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FrankR

I hope Sarah goes 3rd party.


16 posted on 12/08/2009 9:55:05 AM PST by Scythian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Lou Budvis
All Palin is doing is reminding the GOP that they can’t take generic unhappiness with the current Congress and administration for granted and just offer business as usual — and that’s helpful indeed.

I agree. IF the GOP gives us another RINO candidate, well then, they are the ones who went 3rd party.
17 posted on 12/08/2009 9:55:08 AM PST by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: evad

It’s up to the republican party. I won’t vote RINO again.
No Huck, no Romney, no Newt, and I could go on and on.
I’m done, they gave me the “If you don’t vote for McCain you elect Obama” line last time, well guess what, I voted Palin, which was still a vote for the Rino McCain and we still got Obama....

I will vote for Palin, Hunter or Demint. I will consider others, but I won’t vote Rino again.


18 posted on 12/08/2009 9:55:50 AM PST by Robbin (If Sarah isnÂ’t welcome, IÂ’m not welcome, itÂ’s just that simpleÂ…)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand

If Palin lost the nomination I think she would back the nominee, but I truly believe that no matter what she would say, that if its a RINO people like me will not vote...I’m done playing that game.

The lesser of two evils is still evil and I’d rather get the revolution over with at that point.


19 posted on 12/08/2009 9:56:17 AM PST by MNlurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: DM1

I don’t think so.
Enough people are fed up with Republicans.

However, even if you’re right, Ms. Palin has nothing to lose by running as a 3rd Party candidate. The GOP was stupid to let that situation develop.


20 posted on 12/08/2009 9:56:31 AM PST by Lorianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-136 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson