Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SJSAMPLE
The Austin city council decided to “go green” and buy wind energy from West Texas and other sources. However, it was expensive, so they couldn’t swing it unless they made it voluntarily for environtally (but not economically) minded people.

How expensive and why? In this case it sounds like someone was charging a city government a premium for social and political reasons. Electricity is just like any other commodity and people try to get as much as they can for it. Marketing it as Green CAN SOMETIMES earn a premium but usually not.

76 posted on 12/09/2009 8:54:42 AM PST by DungeonMaster (camel, eye of a needle; rich man, heaven)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]


To: DungeonMaster

It was expensive because it was wind-generated.
Currently, wind-generated electricity is added to the grid as a social service, rather than an economic necessity.

Austin bought the wind credits, thinking everybody was as illogical as the city council, and hoping that they would pony up for the increased rates.

Electricity is only a commodity AFTER it’s added to the grid.
Before that, it’s an economic entity and now, apparently, a political/social one as well.


79 posted on 12/09/2009 9:13:42 AM PST by SJSAMPLE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies ]

To: DungeonMaster

Their version:
http://www.ci.austin.tx.us/greenchoice/

The truth:
http://www.statesman.com/news/content/news/stories/local/2009/07/12/0712greenchoice.html


81 posted on 12/09/2009 9:19:33 AM PST by SJSAMPLE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson