Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Favor Center; Vendome
Lesser evil is still evil.

Bush ran as a conservative. His platform was almost libertarian. If he had aimed the country in that direction, we wouldn't be where we are now as the Republicans would have kept control of the congress, Jumpin' Jim notwithstanding.

51 posted on 12/07/2009 10:05:20 PM PST by altair (I want him to fail)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]


To: altair

here is the deal. We thought when GW was gone there would be an idealogical fight. Well we got one alright.

No one disagreed with their opponent. In fact, they said so many times “we are in agreement” “probably not much different”, etc. It was disgusting.

There were no real good choices and so BDS set in combined with McCain’s candidacy and we got Barry O.


54 posted on 12/07/2009 10:08:45 PM PST by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously... You'll never live through it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

To: altair

“Bush ran as a conservative. His platform was almost libertarian. If he had aimed the country in that direction, we wouldn’t be where we are now as the Republicans would have kept control of the congress, Jumpin’ Jim notwithstanding.”

Almost libertarian. On some things. He talked about some of his later liberal domestic policy ideas in the 2nd debate with the Goron, though. He did specifically run against nation-building.

He couldn’t keep up the conservative facade after the first campaign and didn’t even really bother after he’d gotten what he needed from us voters in 2004.

If he’d been at least somewhat conservative in policy and had used the bully pulpit effectively, we would not be facing national economic collapse and an increasingly totalitarian government. At the very least, spending would not have almost doubled from Clinton. Pity he was a lib at heart.


55 posted on 12/07/2009 10:11:33 PM PST by Favor Center (Targets Up! Hold hard and favor center!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

To: altair

“His platform was almost libertarian”

I guess we didn’t understand what “compassionate conservatism” meant.

But I do recall that he pledged “no nation building” under his adminsitration during one of the debates.

Of course 9/11 “ changed all that”. As far as I’m concerned, it didn’t need to change that part.

Go after the guys? Sure. Blow the he|| out of them? Heck
yeah?

But spend American blood and treasure to form them into a specific kind of country afterwards? Not me.

As far as I’m concerned they can go right back to being backwar a-holes - with one stipulation: They try it again, we blow the he|| out of them again.

I think they’d get the message eventually.

When I think of how many Amnericans have died over there to “avoid civilian casualties”.... It’s sickening.

We worry more about world PR than our own citizens lives.


164 posted on 12/08/2009 10:03:22 AM PST by Pessimist (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson