Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Favor Center

You say that my “standards are low” because I consider President Bush to be our best national leader since Reagan. If you disagree, which intervening president do you think showed better leadership? George H.W. Bush or Bill Clinton?

It is difficult for any strong man to admit a mistake - particularly in the case of war strategy. It is much easier to say from the sidelines what a leader should do on the field, than it is to actually make those consequential decisions. President Bush made the right decision on the surge, stood behind it, and saw it through to a successful conclusion. Well done.

I don’t believe President Bush “stole” money from the American people to give to Africa and “other foreign aid” - unless one’s definition of thievery includes a large percentage of federal expenditures. Under that definition, it could be said that President Reagan “stole” money from the American people to give to Israel, the contras, etc. I don’t think it buttresses your argument against President Bush to blame him personally for things that all presidents do.

President Bush was vastly better than his principal opponents in ‘00 and ‘04. The country and the world are better off today because of his service, than we would be had his opponents been elected.


156 posted on 12/08/2009 9:49:26 AM PST by karnage (worn arguments and old attitudes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies ]


To: karnage

“You say that my “standards are low” because I consider President Bush to be our best national leader since Reagan. If you disagree, which intervening president do you think showed better leadership? George H.W. Bush or Bill Clinton?”

Your standards are low because we haven’t had a national leader since Reagan.

“President Bush made the right decision on the surge, stood behind it, and saw it through to a successful conclusion. Well done.”

After how many years? The war isn’t actually OVER, so I’m not sure about the “conclusion” part....

“I don’t believe President Bush “stole” money from the American people to give to Africa and “other foreign aid” - unless one’s definition of thievery includes a large percentage of federal expenditures.”

Yes, it is theft. Much of it. Charity with the public purse is criminal.

“President Bush was vastly better than his principal opponents in ‘00 and ‘04. The country and the world are better off today because of his service, than we would be had his opponents been elected.”

That’s not saying much at all.


159 posted on 12/08/2009 9:52:29 AM PST by Favor Center (Targets Up! Hold hard and favor center!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson