Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Charges against Blacksburg mother dismissed
WDBJ7 ^ | December 7, 2009 | Not referenced

Posted on 12/07/2009 10:15:22 AM PST by sevinufnine

Mary Parks was charged in the death of her son back in September of 2007. Parks' nearly two-year-old son died of heat stroke after being left in his mother's car.

Authorities say Parks went to pick her child up from daycare, but its staff told her the child was not there. That's when she found the toddler unresponsive in the back seat of the car.

(Excerpt) Read more at wdbj7.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: Virginia
KEYWORDS: childdeath; neglect
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101 next last
To: sevinufnine

Once the courts start to dismiss these types of crimes, more people will use that as a means to hurt their children.
And, if that’s the case - as concerned citizens I guess we
should start getting in the habit of looking in the back of peoples cars.


21 posted on 12/07/2009 10:46:04 AM PST by savage woman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sevinufnine

I have nothing constructive on this topic other than this:

The name ‘Blacksburg’ is highly offensive to me and has racial overtones. We can never move forward as a people or as a nation of healing when such great attempts as naming a city ‘Blacksburg’ is used an attempt to oppress my fellow people of color, some outstanding citizens of color in blacksburg include the like of michael and marcus vick. This portrayal of this comoonity cannot proceed as it is......
Therefore I motion we have a parade and a boycott of the town until it is renamed its proper name.......Caucasionally-disenfranchisedburg. Thank you.

/s


22 posted on 12/07/2009 10:50:13 AM PST by AtlasThugged316 (Who is Edmund Ruffin?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sevinufnine

Just a successful late term abortion.


23 posted on 12/07/2009 10:50:56 AM PST by the_daug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJSAMPLE

There is a cost/benefit analysis to be done here. First the crime (or mistake) of carelessness in forgetting a child in a car seat is fairly uncommon and as reasnable people can tell you the unintentional death of a child is it’s own deterrent of a much larger magnitude than prison.

So the benefit to society in deterring other careless parents is minimal compared to the cost of incarcerating for deterrance purposes.

Prisons are pretty much overflowing already so taking up space with someone unlikely to re-offend, since their offense was unintentional in the first place is a waste of resources when there are plenty of intentional criminals who inflict violence on society on a regular basis and are highly likely to re-offend.

I’d rather keep a intentional and violent criminal in for longer than take up space with a non-violent airheaded accidental criminal.

The same argument can be made for the punishment aspect as well. Prison pales in comparison to the death of a child as it’s own punishment, so once again prison is an expensive additional punishment for an accidental offense where there are legions of intentional offenders daily harming society.

If the state is going to show mercy, I’d rather it be to the accidental criminal than the numerous rapists, pedophiles and cop killers they currently seem to favor.


24 posted on 12/07/2009 10:51:37 AM PST by Valpal1 (Always be prepared to make that difference.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: sevinufnine

“Call it insulting if you wish, but one is only insulted if they can see they are wrong and don’t like it.”

Nonsense, I could call you a child rapist and you would be right to be offended. under your logic you would be wrong to be offended.


25 posted on 12/07/2009 10:51:43 AM PST by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SJSAMPLE

“You completely FAIL to miss one or more of the aspects of incarceration:”

And you completely fail to know what the heck you are talking about.

“Punishment: She gets to go to jail for her crime AGAINST SOCIETY. “

If the prosecutor deems that appropriate. perhaps you prefer vigilantes.

“Deterrance: Sending people to jail deters OTHERS from committing the same crime (or, to some, making the same “mistake”).”

So sending her to jail for 3-5 years is more of a deterrent than the death of her child? Sounds like you are the one that FAILS.


26 posted on 12/07/2009 10:53:28 AM PST by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy
"We don’t put people in prison for revenge."

No, but we do put people in prison for punishment.

It’s no different from a child that wanders out of the house and drowns in a pool while the mother is taking a nap? Are you going to punish her for taking a nap?"

Not for taking a nap, but where does negligence enter the picture? Using your scenario, did the mother leave the back door open and the pathway clear to the pool, knowing her child had the capacity to walk or run that distance? What about leaving poisonous cleaners out within reach of the child? What about leaving broken electrical outlets or frayed electrical cords within reach?

Negligence is punishable. Culpable negligence is punishable. From the point where you put the child in the vehicle, you have knowledge of that act. Are you saying the mother didn't know that the child was in the vehicle, that she didn't put the child in the vehicle? Would it be negligence if the mother didn't secure a young child in the seat, left the window down, and the child leaped or fell out the window of the moving car?

Are you saying that these situations cannot be punished for punishment's sake?

27 posted on 12/07/2009 10:54:25 AM PST by BlueLancer (I'm getting a fine tootsy-frootsying right here...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Valpal1

Careful, logic seems to warrant an attack on this thread.


28 posted on 12/07/2009 10:54:27 AM PST by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy

I disagree that we put people in prison to prevent crime.
We put them there as punishment FOR a crime. Sad as it is, she neglected her child. That’s a crime.

Then there are people who may find this an easy way to get rid of an unwanted child.

Hey, you could go camping and “lose” your child by “accident”
and get off scot-free. You see where this could set a dangerous precedent?


29 posted on 12/07/2009 10:54:34 AM PST by derllak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Walkingfeather

“One question is... was she chatting on the phone during the time she thought she dropped her child off at day care?”

In most of these cases, there is a change in routine. Most of the impairment involves lack of sleep in these cases.


30 posted on 12/07/2009 10:55:42 AM PST by AppyPappy (If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: sevinufnine
Because if she CARED in the least that child would have been 1st thing on her mind and not forgotten to die along in the heat trapped in it’s carseat. I have 2 grown kids and I never managed to “forget” where I left them. Not once.

This is borrowed and paraphrased from a fellow Freeper: "Would you leave a purse or wallet with a million dollars in it unattended in your car?"

I think everyone asked would answer "No.", however, many of these same folks can come up with all sorts of excuses as to why a person shouldn't be held responsible in these cases.

31 posted on 12/07/2009 10:56:26 AM PST by IYAS9YAS (The townhalls were going great until the oPods showed up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: AtlasThugged316

The Blacksburg High mascot had to be changed from the Indians to the Bruins a few years back.


32 posted on 12/07/2009 10:56:35 AM PST by AppyPappy (If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

Comment #33 Removed by Moderator

To: AppyPappy

I believe it....

Absolutely par for the course


34 posted on 12/07/2009 10:59:53 AM PST by AtlasThugged316 (Who is Edmund Ruffin?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver
Well, in the military courts, there are five principles for sentencing:

Protection of society from the wrongdoer;

Deterrence of the wrongdoer or those who know of his/her crimes from committing the same or similar offenses,

Rehabilitation of the wrongdoer,

Punishment of the wrongdoer, and

(Applicable to military courts only) Preservation of good order and discipline in the military.

Now, I will grant you that only one principle would apply in a case such as this, and that would be punishment only. I am not saying that hard jail time would be necessary, but rather some punishment should be required ... how about community service in the form of being required to go to post-natal clinics in the area and explaining what occurred to new mothers, to possibly have enough impact on them to ensure that they don't do the same ... or some other community service such as that.

Prison and jail time isn't the only punishment that was available in this situation. But not prosecuting the woman for her negligent act is not the answer either.

35 posted on 12/07/2009 11:00:36 AM PST by BlueLancer (I'm getting a fine tootsy-frootsying right here...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver

No..I would not be offended at all if you called me a child rapist because it’s not true and never will be. Try again....


36 posted on 12/07/2009 11:03:41 AM PST by sevinufnine (Sevin - "If we do not fight when we know we can win, we'll have to fight when we know we will lose")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: sevinufnine

Deep thinker eh


37 posted on 12/07/2009 11:06:41 AM PST by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: sevinufnine

I wonder if the Blacksburg Police even bothered to do a proper investigation? My confidence in that department decreases with every news article released.

For instance: A toddler’s body left in the car in the sun all day would make the car stink of body waste. Did she really not smell anything before arriving at day care?


38 posted on 12/07/2009 11:07:59 AM PST by TaxRelief (I am demoting "Global Warming" from 'theory' to 'deliberate falsehood'.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: derllak

“Hey, you could go camping and “lose” your child by “accident” and get off scot-free.”

So we punish parents for any child that gets lost???
Face it, I can probably point out negligence in the loss of any child. The question is “What do you hope to gain by punishing the person for an accident?”. All it will do is cost us money to house her for a few years. Nothing will change except we will have to release a gang-banger or DWI offender to make room for her. I don’t see what we hope to gain. There was no willful intent so I don’t see what we expect to change.

We have a madman on the loose that killed two college kids just outside of town. I’m worried about that.


39 posted on 12/07/2009 11:09:16 AM PST by AppyPappy (If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: BlueLancer

This woman is already doing similar work on her own to raise awareness of the problem.

Prosecutor’s offices have budgets. Prosecutions cost money. Would you rather have them spend their budget on intentional violent criminals or on non-violent accidental offenders?


40 posted on 12/07/2009 11:10:18 AM PST by Valpal1 (Always be prepared to make that difference.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson