Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GodGunsGuts

[[Because they are setting up fake accounts and pretending they are me on other sites, and then bringing it back here and trying to make it look like I’m a troll, when they are in fact the trolls.]]

That hsould be grounds enough for them to be banned- They’ve proven themselves to be nothign but trolls, nasty trolls at that- anyonme that pull that kind of childish crap isn’t worth wasting any energy on- they’ve proven over and over again that nothign they say can ever be trusted again- and stooping that low is despicable- even for them


48 posted on 12/07/2009 1:29:07 PM PST by CottShop (Scientific belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]


To: CottShop

Thanks, CottShop. Why they allow these slime to keep polluting FR is beyond me.


58 posted on 12/07/2009 1:50:18 PM PST by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

To: CottShop; GodGunsGuts; Jim Robinson
That hsould be grounds enough for them to be banned- They’ve proven themselves to be nothign but trolls, nasty trolls at that- anyonme that pull that kind of childish crap isn’t worth wasting any energy on- they’ve proven over and over again that nothign they say can ever be trusted again- and stooping that low is despicable- even for them

I agree. I have no problem with having evolutionists on a conservative website, even though I believe that conservatism is inescapably founded on the creationary worldview. We all have inconsistencies in our thinking and it would be hopelessly divisive to pretend otherwise.

But these childish tactics of a certain set of Darwinists, not to mention the ludicrous irony of preening self-righteousness even while adopting gutter tactics, should not be tolerated. It's clear that xcamel and others are evolutionary fundamentalists first and foremost, and its not even the least bit clear that they have a clue what conservatism is, or value it one bit.

Yes, I encourage GGG to keep his thick skin too. But xcamel and his ilk should be held accountable by the powers that be, and if there is a mod that is tolerating his and other evolutionists' abusive behavior simply because of shared beliefs, shame on them. I would be ashamed to be caught tolerating disreputable behavior by a creationist were I in a similar position of authority, and so I hope this is not what is happening.

60 posted on 12/07/2009 1:53:12 PM PST by Liberty1970 (Democrats are not in control. God is. And Thank God for that!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

To: CottShop

Maybe someone had that name before GGG, someone asked him about it, he came overhere and wsa offended by this GGG.

Anyone can go to any other web site they like. It should not have any effect what we say at DC about FR.
You can spend all your other free time at a midget porn site for all I care.


72 posted on 12/07/2009 2:20:07 PM PST by Wacka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

To: CottShop

Maybe someone had that name before GGG, someone asked him about it, he came over here and was offended by this GGG.

Does GGG have a copyright on the name?

Anyone can go to any other web site they like. It should not have any effect what we say at DC about FR.
You can spend all your other free time at a midget porn site for all I care.


73 posted on 12/07/2009 2:21:13 PM PST by Wacka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson