Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: OneWingedShark
Such malfunctions are rare, but should be recognized as existing.

And the malfunction is due to?

At some point, someone didn't do what he or she was supposed to do, either with maintenance or quality control.

It may not be the firearm owner's fault, but it could be chalked up to negligence up the line.

Think SKS and slam-fire. Piss-poor negligent design leads to unwanted effect.

42 posted on 12/08/2009 1:31:13 PM PST by IYAS9YAS (The townhalls were going great until the oPods showed up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]


To: IYAS9YAS

>At some point, someone didn’t do what he or she was supposed to do, either with maintenance or quality control.

But that is NOT negligence on part of the [weapon’s] operator, which is integral to the definition of “negligent discharge.”

Furthermore, even with quality-control it is possible to have a single defective item slip past.


43 posted on 12/08/2009 1:51:25 PM PST by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson