If you were REALLY a network TV reporter for 35 years, then you would pretty quickly be able to use that inside knowledge to verify solidly your claim that:
TV and radio stations in Houston have interviewed dozens who were all aboard flight, including three local Texas cops and about a dozen US military. None of the Muslim stuff occurred
If you were REALLY practiced in spotting vague and evasive reporting, you'd have immediately noticed that it runs rampant in this AJC article of Friday.
THAT article confirms from AirTran and/or the TSA that:
1. The pilot decided to return flight 297 to the gate because a male passenger had twice been asked to put away an undetermined electronic device, didn't do so, and the flight attendant took the device away from him.
2. The passenger didn't speak English. He and a companion were asked to leave the plan.
3. The man and 12 others traveling with him were allowed to reboard the plan and it left for Houston a little more than two hours later. The entire incident is described as a communication problem with language; among all those travelling companions, none could spoke the same langage and could have served as an interpreter on the plane and nipped the incident in the bud.
That a so-called experience network TV reporter of 35 years wouldn't recognize that at this point with this information so hazily provided by the AJC, Petruna, Robinson, and Hackemack become irrelevant to the real story ... explains why the MSM is what it is today.
You're all B.S. End of discussion.
THAT article confirms from AirTran and/or the TSA that:
1. The pilot decided to return flight 297 to the gate because a male passenger had twice been asked to put away an undetermined electronic device, didn't do so, and the flight attendant took the device away from him.
2. The passenger didn't speak English. He and a companion were asked to leave the plan.
3. The man and 12 others traveling with him were allowed to reboard the plan and it left for Houston a little more than two hours later. The entire incident is described as a communication problem with language; among all those travelling companions, none could spoke the same langage and could have served as an interpreter on the plane and nipped the incident in the bud.
Things like that happen on a weekly basis... and since the one person who says they were in Muslim dress now admits that statement was “artistic license” and AirTran says they have manifests to prove he was not even on aircraft, how in the hell does this even begin to be Islamic terrorism?
No wonder Obama won if Conservatives are so easy to fool.