Show me where you prove point #1
On Point 2, he does claim activity while at the gate, people’s responses as they exited which would confirm the first witness, but you seem to freely ignore, and he also claims activity of the men remaining on the rest of the flight, something else you freely ignore
As for #3, that is surely more than you, I’d bet, as far as security background. What is his military record, and why would that even mattter if HE was there and me and you weren’t??
This is really a well investigated, rather old story. It’s been on FR in much better detail before. Also, check out the extensive work AJC did on story. Actually, this paper’s details are rather inaccurate. Check it out.
Glad to see you noticed this situation too.