Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dems shoot down GOP amendment to restore Medicare funding
The Hill ^ | 12/5/09 | Walter Alarkon

Posted on 12/05/2009 3:23:51 PM PST by FromLori

Democrats held fast Saturday against another Republican attempt to restore funding for a Medicare program facing cuts in the Senate healthcare bill.

During a rare weekend session, Senate Democrats blocked a GOP move to restore about $42 billion in funding for a home healthcare Medicare program. Democrats argued that the cuts wouldn't affect Medicare patients' quality of care and would make the home healthcare benefit stronger by forcing it to be more efficient.

The amendment received the support of 41 senators, most of whom were Republicans. A floor amendment to the healthcare bill needs 60 votes to be adopted.

Republicans have sought to portray the approximately $460 billion worth of Medicare cuts in the healthcare bill as evidence that the Democrats' plans will put seniors' healthcare at risk.

"What will happen is that these programs will disappear because they'll go in the red because of the cuts these Democrats are proposing," said Sen. Mike Johanns (R-Neb.), the sponsor of the amendment that was rejected Saturday.

On Thursday, Republicans offered an amendment blocking all proposed Medicare cuts, but it failed on a largely party-line vote.

Democrats have pushed back against the GOP strategy by noting that the AARP supports the Medicare reductions, which will help pay for the rest of the healthcare reform legislation. Democrats accused Republicans on Saturday of standing in the way of healthcare proposals that will help all Americans, including seniors.

"They keep wanting to strip something out, they keep wanting to send the bill back so it ends this process altogether," said Sen. John Kerry (D-Mass.) "But they don't come to the floor of the Senate and show us how we could fix it more effectively and, in fact, serve seniors better rather than just embracing the status quo."

While most of the Democratic conference voted to reject the amendment, a handful of centrist Democrats joined the GOP Saturday. The Democratic defectors were Sens. Evan Bayh (Ind.), Blanche Lincoln (Ark.), Jim Webb (Va.) and Ben Nelson (Neb.).

Republicans see the battle over Medicare as key to winning over public support in their attempts to stop the Democrats' healthcare proposals.

"Every survey anybody has seen on this issue shows that the American people are asking us to stop this bill," Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) said Saturday.

A USA Today/Gallup survey released this week showed that 49 percent of Americans want their members of Congress to oppose the bill while 44 percent of Americans want their lawmakers to support it.

Republicans plan to try to attack the Democrats on Medicare again Sunday with another amendment aimed at the proposed cuts, a senior Senate GOP aide said.

Democrats are countering with their own Medicare-related amendment Sunday. The proposal by Sen. Blanche Lincoln (D-Ark.) would limit tax deductions on pay for health insurance executives so that they could make no more than the president, whose salary is $400,000. The savings, which Democrats estimate to be $650 billion over 10 years, would go into the Medicare trust fund.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) said that Lincoln's amendment and other changes in the healthcare bill will lead to a more efficient healthcare system that covers more Americans.

"The fact is that our bill will, in short, save lives, save money, and save Medicare," Reid said. "It will make it possible for each and every American to afford to live a healthy life. We can't afford not to do this."


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: amendment; gop; medicaire

1 posted on 12/05/2009 3:23:52 PM PST by FromLori
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: FromLori
The democrat party has declared themselves the anti-aged party. AARP should lose most of it's membership over this one (although I'm not holding my breath).
2 posted on 12/05/2009 3:25:08 PM PST by highlander_UW (To anger a conservative tell him a lie. To anger a liberal tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: highlander_UW

I can’t even imagine if these roles were reversed. The hell that would be breaking loose.


3 posted on 12/05/2009 3:28:16 PM PST by paul544
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: highlander_UW

Last summer my husband paid our membership up for two years. Dang it! I will call next week and see if we can get a refund. If not, I’ll just tell ‘em where they can put it.


4 posted on 12/05/2009 3:31:01 PM PST by REPANDPROUDOFIT (You can call me "ma'am" !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: paul544
I can’t even imagine if these roles were reversed. The hell that would be breaking loose.

As I see it, one of the core problems America faces is the abdication of their legitimacy by the vast majority of newspapers and other media sources. We no longer have widespread freedom of the press.

5 posted on 12/05/2009 3:31:45 PM PST by highlander_UW (To anger a conservative tell him a lie. To anger a liberal tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: REPANDPROUDOFIT
Last summer my husband paid our membership up for two years. Dang it! I will call next week and see if we can get a refund. If not, I’ll just tell ‘em where they can put it.

Tell them that you want your money back because they collected it under false pretenses. They claim that they represent the interests of retired and approaching retiring people when they clearly do not. I wonder if there's a class action lawsuit in there somewhere for some enterprising set of lawyers.

6 posted on 12/05/2009 3:33:38 PM PST by highlander_UW (To anger a conservative tell him a lie. To anger a liberal tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: FromLori

“The Democratic defectors were Sens. Evan Bayh (Ind.)”

Bayh is up for reelection next year. After voting for all things Obama, Reed, Pelosi, he now backtracking. It won’t work Bayh.


7 posted on 12/05/2009 3:36:55 PM PST by caver (Obama's first goals: allow more killing of innocents and allow the killers of innocents to go free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: highlander_UW

Talked a friend of mine in the nursing home business this weekend, he says they are about done anyway and this will kill the long term care business. He said that there is a new Medicare change coming out in 2010 that stops paying for rehab in Nursing homes that is going to shut down a lot of places. So, Hospitals will have to start keeping patients longer due to no where to discharge people too. Plus, Medicaid is only paying for about 60% of the cost of a bed.


8 posted on 12/05/2009 4:32:36 PM PST by ClayinVA ("Those who don't remember history are doomed to repeat it")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: FromLori

Don’t have the time but sure wish someone could research this. I have.a hunch that the dems were responsible for the spending they are now wanting to cut.


9 posted on 12/05/2009 4:34:02 PM PST by trustandobey (GOD BLESS AMERICA AGAIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FromLori

Democrats are countering with their own Medicare-related amendment Sunday. The proposal by Sen. Blanche Lincoln (D-Ark.) would limit tax deductions on pay for health insurance executives so that they could make no more than the president, whose salary is $400,000. The savings, which Democrats estimate to be $650 billion over 10 years, would go into the Medicare trust fund.

Can these people get any more unconstitutional than this?

Wait, I can answer that one, YES.


10 posted on 12/05/2009 4:38:39 PM PST by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FromLori

This is irrelevant. The only relevant point is any federal version of government run health care is unconstitutional since Article 1 Section 8 does not specifically grant Congress the power to regulate health care. This is the point people need to impress upon their politicians!


11 posted on 12/05/2009 4:44:42 PM PST by Man50D (Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it! www.FairTaxNation.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

12 posted on 12/05/2009 4:47:59 PM PST by FromLori (FromLori)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: FromLori

So true! LOL!!!!!


13 posted on 12/05/2009 4:49:22 PM PST by Man50D (Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it! www.FairTaxNation.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: paul544

You’re kidding, right? I recall very well how the damned DemocRATS accused Republicans of cutting funding to Medicare and accused them of trying to kill seniors, making them choose between eating (cat food) and having their prescription drugs. And the lies were parroted on EVERY damned channel of the main/lamestream media. In fact, the Reps were increasing medicare....just not as ‘big’ an increase as the ahole DemocRATS wanted (they were not in power, however). THAT is how they, the DemonRats play and that is how they ‘roll’. It’s time that we start playing as rough as they do....and maybe a helluva lot rougher.

Past time, in fact.


14 posted on 12/05/2009 5:37:07 PM PST by XenaLee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ClayinVA
Plus, Medicaid is only paying for about 60% of the cost of a bed.

Hospitals won't be able to absorb the difference, so they're going to have to force people out into the streets to die. I'm constantly amazed at how evil liberals really are. They can cheerfully consign untold hundreds of thousands to death and try to claim it's progress...but then again, compared to their roots in communism and socialism they're pikers till they hit the hundreds of millions. I guess that's how they can live with the 30 million plus children murdered in the name of progress and convenience by the liberals.

15 posted on 12/05/2009 10:23:25 PM PST by highlander_UW (To anger a conservative tell him a lie. To anger a liberal tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson