To: Tallguy
Admirals Mast or Captains Mast? I didn’t know there was an Admirals Mast. One thing about a Captains Mast is that the, so called victim, could file suit in civilian court after the Captains Mast. That is my understanding. In a Court Martial, the Seals can’t be brought to court again by anyone. It would be considered double jepordy (sp?).
37 posted on
12/05/2009 8:48:59 AM PST by
RC2
To: RC2
I read Admiral’s mast, but I have to be honest with you, it’s the first time I’ve heard the term also. I suppose that would be either the CinC for the theater, or perhaps the Top SEAL himself?
45 posted on
12/05/2009 9:05:02 AM PST by
Tallguy
("The sh- t's chess, it ain't checkers!" -- Alonzo (Denzel Washington) in "Training Day")
To: RC2; Tallguy
The SEALs were offered nonjudicial punishment, but supposedly refused. The convening authority, Maj Gen Charles Cleveland (commander of Special Operations Command Central) , signed off on sending them to a court martial. He made the final call.
(from a previous thread)
Looking further into this, Maj Gen Cleveland has convened an Article 32 investigation for a Special Courts Martial. From a reliable authority, the Article 32 determines whether to proceed or dismiss based on the merits of the case.
This just may go away shortly.
55 posted on
12/05/2009 9:27:03 AM PST by
BIGLOOK
(Keelhaul Congress!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson