But-—
According to the Dallas Morning News editors, everything is cool with the other three research units.
Here is an excerpt from today’s editorial in the Dallas Morning News.
“”But human-driven climate change does exist. The evidence for it is so strong that the outrageous CRU deception scarcely damages it. CRU is one of four major research units around the world keeping comprehensive global temperature records. Every one of them has reached the same conclusions as the British. Are they all lying?”””
Think about what these editors have said in the above sentence.
1. The British research unit engaged in outrageous deception by using false data and corrupt computer models.
2. The other three research units used good data and good computer models.
3. All four research units reached the same conclusion.
Hmmm???? How can this be? The British engage in outrageous deception and reach conclusion “A”. The other three research units use angelic data and angelic computer models and also reach conclusion “A”.
Since the editors have already confessed that the British are lying, therefore to answer the editors question: “Yes, they are all lying.”
We have Freedom of the Press for a reason. And that reason is not to let the Press engage in propaganda. The Press should be a bastion of truth searchers.
Dallas Morning News is just spouting gibberish.
It’s not just CRU, but specific leading scientists, including Michael Mann of Penn State, who have been found trying to fire journal editors who allowed ‘skeptic’ papers to be published, skewed data and conspired to hide information to avoid Freedom of Information requests. The CRU site was where the emails were taken from, but there were emails from others, like Mann and Ben Santer, who said things embarrassing or wrong.
Unless and until the air is cleared and the science rebalanced you cannot trust any of these sources, and these sources were the lead authors on IPCC reports - so you cant trust what the IPCC says.
Frankly, the NASA/GISS is the MOST suspect of the temperature records, they’ve been caught in the past with biases/mistakes (eg year 2000 ‘bug’), so pinning this as a British problem is simply ignorant.