Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

I posted the earlier thread when this pic was first released and no one knew what it was. So, this is an update. Cool tech!
1 posted on 12/04/2009 3:46:27 PM PST by Reaganesque
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last
To: Reaganesque

What’s it carbon footprint?/s


2 posted on 12/04/2009 3:48:35 PM PST by Dallas59 (No To O -Time is going by really really really really slow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reaganesque

I can’t see it... no, wait, um, yes, there it is! I can see it!!!!!


3 posted on 12/04/2009 3:49:07 PM PST by irishtenor (Beer. God's way of making sure the Irish don't take over the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reaganesque
This is what it looks like:






4 posted on 12/04/2009 3:49:57 PM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reaganesque

Unarmed?


5 posted on 12/04/2009 3:50:07 PM PST by null and void (We are now in day 317 of our national holiday from reality. - 0bama really isn't one of US.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reaganesque

The Polecat was 2 engines this puppy is single.


6 posted on 12/04/2009 3:52:16 PM PST by omega4179 (0 is an embarrassment to us all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reaganesque

Makes you wonder how many times that aircraft has been photographed and reported as an alien craft of some sort.


13 posted on 12/04/2009 4:00:16 PM PST by exnavy (Where's Rooster Cogburn when you need 'em?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reaganesque

This wing can’t be the fabled “Aurora”, is it?


14 posted on 12/04/2009 4:01:03 PM PST by montomike (Politics should be about service and not a lucrative, money-making opportunity!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reaganesque

Looks a lot like the B-2. They still have neither confirmed nor denied the Aurora. I remember Popular Mechanics doing an article on that many years ago. The supposed replacement for the SR-71.


15 posted on 12/04/2009 4:01:54 PM PST by FlyVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reaganesque

High altitude light colored and unarmed?
One of these doesn’t fit.
Unless it’s ARMED and low altitude.


16 posted on 12/04/2009 4:01:58 PM PST by Darksheare (Tar is cheap, and feathers are plentiful.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All
This from Wikipedai (posted just an hour ago):

The 30th Reconnaissance Squadron, which is based at Tonopah Test Range Airport, operates RQ-170 Sentinels. This squadron was activated on September 1, 2005. RQ-170 Sentinels have been deployed to Afghanistan, where one was sighted at Kandahar International Airport in late 2007.[1]

So, the Air Force can keep a secret when it wants to.

20 posted on 12/04/2009 4:05:37 PM PST by Reaganesque ("And thou shalt do it with all humility, trusting in me, reviling not against revilers.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reaganesque

http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/blogs/defense/index.jsp?plckController=Blog&plckBlogPage=BlogViewPost&newspaperUserId=27ec4a53-dcc8-42d0-bd3a-01329aef79a7&plckPostId=Blog:27ec4a53-dcc8-42d0-bd3a-01329aef79a7Post:649e3cf4-8c07-4739-82cf-322c6c56ccd5&plckScript=blogScript&plckElementId=blogDest


21 posted on 12/04/2009 4:07:30 PM PST by narses ('in an odd way this is cheering news!'.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reaganesque
Not this one???


22 posted on 12/04/2009 4:08:38 PM PST by wannabegeek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reaganesque

My understanding is that it does have an integral bomb bay. It could be unarmed only in the strictest sense —i.e. this copy contained no internal weapons store at the time of photo.

I think the F-22 will be the last of the high-ticket manned systems, or those that carry humans will do so only as an option.


23 posted on 12/04/2009 4:08:38 PM PST by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reaganesque
It's flown by the 30th Reconnaissance Squadron

Dang, that has to be the coolest job in the world. Uh,,, I volunteer to fly them for FREEEEE if anyone is reading this, NO PAY REQUIRED!!!!!!!!!!!

24 posted on 12/04/2009 4:09:12 PM PST by MrPiper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reaganesque
RQ = Revolution Quasher


Frowning takes 68 muscles.
Smiling takes 6.
Pulling this trigger takes 2.
I'm lazy.

26 posted on 12/04/2009 4:15:31 PM PST by The Comedian (Evil can only succeed if good men don't point at it and laugh.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reaganesque

The great irony is that what the USAF needs right now is not high tech, but inexpensive, durable, expendable, low tech aircraft. Not to do the sexy, stealthy, futuristic missions, but just endless, routine ordinary stuff.

If you look at the US Army, you will see what I mean. For every fighting soldier, there are 15 support soldiers. For every Stryker, there are probably 30 trucks. And the same thing applies to the USAF.

For every high tech fighter aircraft, you need a large number of transports, cheap and durable bombers like the B-52, UAVs that do close air support and reconnaissance for thousands of hours where it doesn’t matter if the enemy sees them, even blimps that just sit there while doing half a dozen missions at the same time.

I would say that the biggest design mission of the Skunkworks should be to design both a replacement for the B-52 that is more efficient yet still low maintenance; and to design a UAV that costs about as much per unit as an economy car.


29 posted on 12/04/2009 4:33:45 PM PST by yefragetuwrabrumuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reaganesque
The U.S. Air Force has confirmed to Aviation Week the existence of the so-called “Beast of Kandahar” UAV, a stealth-like remotely piloted jet seen flying out of Afghanistan in late 2007.

http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/generic/story_generic.jsp?channel=defense&id=news/BEAST120409.xml&headline=USAF%20Confirms%20Stealthy%20UAV%20Operations

Bush's fault.

30 posted on 12/04/2009 4:37:31 PM PST by McGruff (We're Going Rogue Baby!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reaganesque

Why is it called “Skunk Works?”


31 posted on 12/04/2009 4:37:35 PM PST by sergeantdave (obuma is the anti-Lincoln, trying to re-establish slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reaganesque

“unmanned aircraft”,


32 posted on 12/04/2009 4:38:12 PM PST by org.whodat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reaganesque

“It’s unarmed”.

Not yet. I wonder what that will do with a couple of chain guns mounted fore and aft.


38 posted on 12/04/2009 5:05:31 PM PST by NTHockey (Rules of engagement #1: Take no prisoners)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson