Here are the specific pieces of “evidence” that was used to convict her. Found the post on the other Knox thread.
(posted on Saturday, December 05, 2009 11:18:19 AM by the scotsman)
General and circumstantial evidence:
- Alibis changed several times.
- Inconsistencies in alibis, which still remain.
- Alibis contradicted by 3 independent witnesses, and by analysis of computer hard drive.
- Witness saw them both outside cottage with knives that night.
- Cell phones switched off early in evening, contrary to normal habits.
- Break-in was faked, nobody but Knox and Sollecito had a motive.
- Washing machine was run on morning after murder, and cleanup attempted long after Guede had fled.
- Victim’s injuries point to more than one attacker, as do footprints and witness hearing running feet.
- Highly improbable story of Knox showering in house on morning after murder, unworried by broken window, open door, blood stains, unflushed toilet.
- Lie by Sollecito about phone call from father that evening.
- Lie by Sollecito about Meredith being pricked with knife while cooking.
- Lie about what time they called the Carabanieri.
- Knox had knowledge about manner of victim’s death even before the police knew.
- False accusation by Knox against Patrick. Knox told mother shortly afterwards that Patrick was innocent, but neither made any attempt to tell police or lawyers.
- Knox may have been on bad terms with victim.
Forensic evidence:
- Knife with victim’s DNA in Sollecito’s apartment.
- Sollectio’s DNA on victims bra, possibly Knox’s DNA on victim’s bra.
- Knox’s blood mixed with victim’s blood: in bathroom (3 places), hallway, room with faked break-in.
- Footprints in blood compatible with Knox in hallway, cleaned after murder, revealed with luminol.
- Footprint in victim’s blood compatible with Sollecito on bathmat.
- Print of woman’s shoe compatible with Knox’s shoe size (not victim’s) under victim’s body.
- A number of forensic experts called by the defence were unable to dent the prosecution case.
Background (not evidence in itself, but supports evidence):
- Knox: heavy marijuana and alcohol user, casually slept with many men. Fined for wild party in Seattle. Cold, abnormal behavior after murder: “She f-ing bled to death”. Laughing, kissing, making faces in police station soon after murder. Day after body discovered Knox shopped for sexy lingerie, kissed in public, talked about wild sex. Cartwheels in police station waiting room. Didn’t attend memorial for victim, went for pizza instead.
- Sollecito: arrogant and spoiled, marijuana and cocaine user, collected knives and always carried a knife with him. Collected violent, pornographic comics. Collected besiality porn. Had poster of serial killer on his wall. Wanted ‘extreme experiences’.
posted on Saturday, December 05, 2009 11:18:19 AM by the scotsman
I don't believe the evidence that you have presented is accurate. Most of it is pure speculation. The DNA evidence has been refuted by her experts. I find the comments about the boyfriend to be particularly low. He had manga comics which are popular all over the world. Yes they are violent, but there are plenty of movies that are much much worse. He is a spoiled rich kid!? I know his family is rich. How do you know he is spoiled? The cocaine and marijuana user smear is really spiteful. Millions of young adults around the world use these drugs recreationaly. It doesn't turn them into animals.
I believe the prosecutor (Guilano Mignini) is a nutcase that is more concerned about his reputation that justice. He is just like the prosecutors in Wenatchee, WA that railroaded that poor family into jail with fabricated evidence. He is obsessed with witchcraft, devil worship, and child molestation just like the prosecutors were in Wenatchee, WA. This is just a modern day witch trial.