I understand that reading comprehension is hard.
I understand that picking one sentence out of several posts in a feeble attempt to make your argument is tempting.
I do not understand why you can’t admit you are wrong since I very clearly repeatedly stated that I would not show his records if he were my child and that I don’t think she should show it.
She is in the same boat because she was asked to show the records and didn’t, just as he has been asked.
If you can’t understand why this is a demonstrably bad argument - to say Sarah Palin did something that she did not do and to try to use it as a club to whack Obama with (she showed it so he should, too), I can’t help you.
All I can do is suggest you sit back and bask in the golden glory of the massive success that this type of wrong thinking has brought the BC movement so far.
“She is in the same boat because she was asked to show the records and didn’t, just as he has been asked.”
You still don’t seem to comprehend the difference between complying with a legal/constitutional requirement and press inquiries. I can’t help you with that, won’t even try.