But her second statement speaks to the BC question being of no interest to her, and qualifies her previous statement to mean that the ASKING OF the question is legitimate, not the question itself.
A candidate gets in trouble when her supporters stop believing what she says, and start interpreting it the way they want.
“But her second statement speaks to the BC question being of no interest to her, and qualifies her previous statement to mean that the ASKING OF the question is legitimate, not the question itself.”
Absolutely Incorrect.
Wishful thinking on your part Charles.
She is being one her detractors say she isn’t. She is being clever and politically competent. Her goal is to run for President and not get caught up in this side issue.
Her job is not to taken on the BC issue. It’s to get elected in 2012.
This is clear if you read what it says and not what you want it to say.