Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Bob J

I think you’re missing the point of the term “rightfully”. The people do have the right to know everything about a candidate that might affect his judgement or ability to do the job that he is elected to do. This would include any questions related to ethics, past associations, natural-born citizen requirements, etc.

Most employers conduct drug screening and background checks for this very reason. Many accountants have their credit reports reviewed before hiring. Small business loans require enormous amounts of personal info in order to determine if the recipient is worthy. An employer has the option (an should be legally bound) to require an employee to provide proof of citizenship or legal authority to work in the U.S. if it is in question.

Why should the most important job in the country have any different standards? As Obama’s employers, we the people have the right to ask these questions and require proof.


36 posted on 12/04/2009 10:16:34 AM PST by TXDuke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: TXDuke; ExTexasRedhead; justiceseeker93; traderrob6; OL Hickory; socialismisinsidious; trlambsr; ...
right, and what about all the "conspiracies" people CONTINUE to entertain about Palin lie #1: she banned books lie #2: Trig isn't really her baby lie #3: she is part of a secessionist 3rd Party lie #4: she requested her $150,000 wardrobe lie #5: she and Todd are about to divorce etc..etc..etc..
38 posted on 12/04/2009 10:34:29 AM PST by CondoleezzaProtege ("When I survey the wondrous cross...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson