Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cicero

maybe the baby was smothered by cloths and blankets that were deployed to maintain “privacy” and to keep flight attendents from complaining about the mother breastfeeding “out in the open”.

We had a thread a month or so ago about a woman who discretely fed her baby, but didn’t throw a blanket over her, while on the airplane, and a stewardess forced her to stop feeding.

A lot of people here said the woman was wrong, and should put the baby under a blanket so “they wouldn’t be offended” by seeing a woman’s breast.

THis might be the reason NOT to do that.


12 posted on 12/04/2009 8:58:52 AM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: CharlesWayneCT

Yes, that could be. Using a shawl with breathing holes would be OK, but maybe she used a tight blanket.

What a sick society we have, where there is plentiful pornography and sex all over the place, but feeding a baby in public is not tolerated.

I once got into a scholarly discussion of why in the middle ages it was thought proper to portray the Virgin Mary breast feeding the Infant Jesus in religious paintings. But then something happened around the time of the Reformation, and that sort of portrayal has never since been seen as a normal convention in religious art, either Protestant or Catholic.


15 posted on 12/04/2009 10:05:21 AM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson