Did you EVEN READ the post? Have you ever been evaluated for reading comprehension?
Because the flood did not extinguish sealife (Mmmmm, not surehow that would work) you opine there should be no evidence that individual creatures did in fact die, for whatever reason?
Man, evo’s can be tiresome.
But according to other creves, the waters boiled up from underground. All the sea life would have been killed. Or will you come up with another “just so” idea?
GGG won’t answer, maybe you will. Why are there no trilobite fossils above the Permian layer?
Because the flood did not extinguish sealife (Mmmmm, not surehow that would work) you opine there should be no evidence that individual creatures did in fact die, for whatever reason?
It certainly is difficult to understand what you're trying to say. I'm not surprised you resort so quickly to insult and generally rude behavior. You seem to have difficulty writing comprehensible sentences and need a way to cover this inability.
I also noticed you ducked the question entirely. I'll keep it simple.
If no sea animals were killed in the flood, as you claimed in your previous post, where did the millions of fossils of sea animals come from?