Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Buck W.
That is the most succinct and dead-on accurate description that I have ever read of the FR creaion rationalizers. You know, it could even be a tag line...

This started over an an easily disproven generalization. Let's not compound it with another one.

615 posted on 12/06/2009 6:38:21 AM PST by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 613 | View Replies ]


To: tacticalogic

“This started over an an easily disproven generalization. Let’s not compound it with another one.”

Fair enough in reference to creationists as a whole, but still quite applicable to FR’s core group without the need for generalization.


616 posted on 12/06/2009 7:36:27 AM PST by Buck W. (The President of the United States IS named Schickelgruber...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 615 | View Replies ]

To: tacticalogic

[[This started over an an easily disproven generalization.]]

Stil lwaitign for your ‘slapdown’ to begin TL- So far, all you’ve managed to do is say “You simply don’t understand scriptures’, yet you’ve offered absolutely no defense for your claims that scriptures can’t really be trusted because 1: they were nothign but the words of man’ 2: There are many ways to interpret scriptures’

Easily disporven? Mmmmm Hmmmm - stil lawaiting the brilliant ‘slapdown’- guess I’ll be wating for quite sometime- Guess al lI’m goign to get is ‘you simply don’t understand scriptures’- ouchie! you big bully- have ya gotta be so rough? lol Let’s see why God’s word isn’t infact His word- Let’s see why nothign in God’s word can be taken literally, and let’s see the evidence that shows the key concepts in God’s message are nothign more than local cultural myths weaved into a ‘good book’- after all, isn’t that what you beleive i nthe end?

I understand scriptues just fine- it seems that you aren’t even willign to accept them as the Scriptures of God, and you’re acusing me of not undersytanding scriptures? lol- whatever- again- you appear to want the approval from the two camps- the beleiver’s camp, and the atheist’s camp- you can’t serve two masters- choose which it will be- at least have the strength of character to commit to one or the other camp (I can assure you that you won’t be dissappointed if you ever commit to God’s camp- He’ll enlighten you to the truths of His word, if you’ll only allow Him to instead of continually insisting, without expoeriential knowledge I mgiht add, that the bible isn’t His word- He’ll show you Hismelf that it infact is, if you’ll simpyl invite Him to)


620 posted on 12/06/2009 9:32:42 AM PST by CottShop (Scientific belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 615 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson