[metmom]

Therefore, according to the guidelines posted by GGG, this thread doesn't belong in News/Activism, but Religion.

On the contrary, if you read the article, it's about the fossil that was classified as being a missing link not being such after all.

If it makes the news and is classified as science news but not religion when the discovery and conclusions were first made, then it should be classified as science news and not religion when the conclusions were changed.

I wasn't aware that changing the classification of a fossil was a religious decision. I thought that the scientists more closely examining the fossil were the ones to reclassify it.

I don't understand why the source of the article dealing with this fact is such an issue with the evolutionists.

[tnlibertarian]

if you read the article, it's about the fossil that was classified as being a missing link not being such after all.

Okay, what does that have to do with religious freedom or someone attempting to deprive us of it?