I believe there was another interview where she talked about this that is clearer - I’m sure someone will post it on this thread, it was probably with Greta.
Energy -> credentials/Alaska -> can contradict McCain.
Illegal immigrants -> no previous record -> can’t contradict.
Not sure what is you don’t understand here. Credentials means she has a proven track record, she had that with energy not with illegal immigration.
Credentials does not equal “ideas”, “positions”, “views” and does not mean her views/ideas are not sound.
You keep using words like lie and flip flop, because you imply she shared MCcain’s position on this.
I’m telling you that she supported the campaign to beat Obama, and she did this as a VP candidate in a campaign taht was already well under way when she joined.
Those on FR who keep up their circular arguments against Palin didn’t like her from the beginning.
Most don’t want a woman president so pick at and create non issues so they are not obvious being a misogynist
Energy -> credentials/Alaska -> can contradict McCain.
Illegal immigrants -> no previous record -> can’t contradict.
Not sure what is you don’t understand here. Credentials means she has a proven track record, she had that with energy not with illegal immigration.
Credentials does not equal “ideas”, “positions”, “views” and does not mean her views/ideas are not sound.
You keep using words like lie and flip flop, because you imply she shared MCcain’s position on this.
I’m telling you that she supported the campaign to beat Obama, and she did this as a VP candidate in a campaign taht was already well under way when she joined.
From her direct comments, she supported a path to citizenship in the campaign, and possibly before. You said she shared McCain's position on the issue so as not to contradict him, due to lack of credentials. Your rationale is that she supported a position contrary to her "views" and stated it publicly for political reasons. If her current comments (ideas) contradict her previous comments, how will it not be viewed as a convenient change in positions (flip flop) in the primary or the general election?
If McCain chooses to run again, will she be able to contradict him without those credentials which you say he possesses. Or did she acquire them recently?
You’re wasting your time...if someone refuses to be convinced, there’s nothing you can do to stop them.