[Brytani]

I’m pretty sure when Mario Apuzzo’s case was thrown out the judge cited online sources in the dismissal. I can search Scribbed and see if I can find the case. The one I’m specifically speaking of is where the judge fined Apuzzo and threatened further sanctions if he continued to file frivolous suits.

There have been so many cases it’s hard to keep them all straight - like I said, I’ll search Scribbed to see what I can find plus I can go onto Pacer if needed.

I am absolutely positive websites have been cited from parties other than Taitz.

You’re 100% right that there is a huge difference between citing a website and introducing it into evidence. That is actually one of the reasons I get so infuriated by Obama and his supporters; they constantly point to a .jpg on a website as “proof” Obama is a US citizen.

While that “evidence” would never hold up in a court of law, some consider it as rock solid evidence of Obama’s eligibility while others, including me, find their “evidence” opens up more questions then answers and it is only proves that Obama will not provide authentic, certified documents that would prove his eligibility.

[BuckeyeTexan]

Here’s a link to a spreadsheet formatted document that lists the eligibility cases and various details about them. It’s decidely biased against birthers, but it’s a list nonetheless.

http://tiny.cc/BirtherScore

[Sibre Fan]

Judge Land, in dismissing Rhodes' TRO case, said in the "background" section of the Opinion (i.e., not in the "Discussion" portion of the ruling in which the rationale for the ruling was set forth) as follows: Plaintiff’s counsel speculates that President Obama was not born in the United States based upon the President’s alleged refusal to disclose publicly an “official birth certificate” that is satisfactory to Plaintiff’s counsel and her followers. She therefore seeks to have the judiciary compel the President to produce “satisfactory” proof that he was born in the United States.Counsel makes these allegations although a “short-form” birth certificate has been made publicly available which indicates that the President was born in Honolulu, Hawaii on August 4, 1961. (Opinion at 3.) So - he didn't rely on it, and didn't say that it was proof of anything. He merely noted that the short form had been made publicly available. Again - this type of "aside" comment is far different from the situation where Orly, and others, have repeatedly submitted copies of blogs, etc., as EVIDENCE to support their various claims.