Then you must know that a Hawaiian official who makes an out of court statement that they have seen the document and it is accurate IS hearsay, and violates the best evidence rule.
That doesnt negate citing Wiki (Phil Berg did it too, and I found that to be comical and it detracted from his credibility too) but the main point of these lawsuits is to compel production of the long form BC, and not rely on hearsay statements from govt. quasimodos as to what the document purports to say.
You’re incorrect on both counts.
The subpoena would be quashed, and testimony as to what a document purports to say is not acceptable when the document is in existence and available.