[RowdyFFC]

Yes, she knows how to file a brief. Do you? Ever filed one?

NO, you haven’t.

Get yourself a life...and be rude somewhere out of my face, thank you. See how easy I am?

[Wally_Kalbacken]

I have, in the same court where she had her rear end handed to her in GA. She has submitted some of the strangest looking, non-conforming pleadings I have ever seen in Federal Court.

The point is that when you are making an argument in court you need to conform to the rules (both Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the local rules of the district court you are in). It's not a trivial point. You want your argument to stand out - by submitting an unfocused, non-conforming series of pleadings and drawing more attention to herself then to her arguments - she weakens her position. I have seen her cite dynamic websites by referencing the URL, as evidence. What's next - Wikipedia? The attached document in this latest effort (the reference to Equatorial Guinea) is no better than that. As evidence, on its face it has no more credibility than a Wikipedia entry.

[1rudeboy]

Yes, she knows how to file a brief.

Not according to Judge Land, his clerks, and the employees at his courthouse. Sorry to rain facts on Taitz' clown parade.

[OldDeckHand]

"Yes, she knows how to file a brief. Do you? Ever filed one?"

No, she doesn't. And, no I haven't filed "one". I have filed thousands. She's incompetent, moving well past the point of malpractice. And, she demonstrates many of the classic signs of paranoid delusion. Just saying.