Skip to comments.
Obama birthplace attorney files new allegations
Orange County Register ^
Posted on 12/03/2009 7:42:53 PM PST by USALiberty
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-123 next last
This is NOT going away! The truth WILL come out!
To: USALiberty
Folks can say what they will, but I am thankful for her.
2
posted on
12/03/2009 7:44:35 PM PST
by
papasmurf
Comment #3 Removed by Moderator
To: USALiberty
Ms. Taitz still has her law license? I’m surprised.
4
posted on
12/03/2009 7:49:37 PM PST
by
1rudeboy
To: USALiberty
"Shes filed a motion to have Carter reconsider the most recent dismissal, while another attorney working on that case has filed an appeal.
Click here to see the document filed by Taitz today. Click here to see the attachment to that document, which is allegedly an immigration forum for Obama."
5
posted on
12/03/2009 7:52:11 PM PST
by
Red Steel
To: 1rudeboy
Why are you surprised? I’m not. Frankly she’s doing one hellova job, and I applaud her!
She’s lived in communism, and she’s fighting for my country!
I am thankful for her efforts and will continue to support her.
6
posted on
12/03/2009 7:52:41 PM PST
by
RowdyFFC
(The opinion of a wise Welshtino woman...)
To: USALiberty
Ethnic Code: Equatorial Guinea
What will Carter say about this? This is from the US Immigration document on Obama that Orly filed. The US attorneys have some 'splainin' to do.
7
posted on
12/03/2009 7:55:22 PM PST
by
circumbendibus
(Where's the Birth Certificate?)
To: RowdyFFC
I’m suprised because I’ve read the legal opinions that slap her down. You apparently have not.
8
posted on
12/03/2009 7:56:59 PM PST
by
1rudeboy
To: circumbendibus
This is from the US Immigration document on Obama that Orly filed. The US attorneys have some 'splainin' to do. I dont think so.
It looks like some kind of internet person search service form.
9
posted on
12/03/2009 7:58:15 PM PST
by
Pontiac
To: Red Steel
An online background report? Marital status unknown, but Michelle Obama listed as relative.
The Good Dr. Taiz had better dust off her checkbook, because she’s going to end up writing another check to a clerk pretty soon.
10
posted on
12/03/2009 8:01:16 PM PST
by
Yo-Yo
To: 1rudeboy
Actually I’ve read them all. And apparently you haven’t, or else you have a reading comprehension problem.
11
posted on
12/03/2009 8:09:01 PM PST
by
RowdyFFC
(The opinion of a wise Welshtino woman...)
To: RowdyFFC
Well, you must be lying, otherwise you would understand that Ms. Taitz, Esq., doesn’t know how to file a brief.
12
posted on
12/03/2009 8:11:24 PM PST
by
1rudeboy
To: USALiberty
To: 1rudeboy
Same here.
This comedy is still unfolding.
To: RowdyFFC
One thing I have noticed is that justice seems to be a game for lawyers. Not knowing how to file a brief derails an entire proceeding. As a citizen I don't have “standing” to demand that a person running/sitting as president meets constitutional requirements. No lawyers have set up a system where procedure is sacrosanct and it is the first major layer of obfuscation of justice. And so many people think it so clever to play games with the system and the people that work so hard to get justice out of it. How smug they are. How corrupt our justice system is.
15
posted on
12/03/2009 8:57:54 PM PST
by
Nuc1
(NUC1 Sub pusher SSN 668 (Liberals Aren't Patriots))
To: LucyT
To: 1rudeboy
Yes, she knows how to file a brief. Do you? Ever filed one?
NO, you haven’t.
Get yourself a life...and be rude somewhere out of my face, thank you. See how easy I am?
17
posted on
12/03/2009 10:42:00 PM PST
by
RowdyFFC
(The opinion of a wise Welshtino woman...)
To: beagleone
She is a raving lunatic and is going to end up losing her ticket if she isn’t more careful.
18
posted on
12/03/2009 10:46:47 PM PST
by
DryFly
To: USALiberty
19
posted on
12/03/2009 11:07:44 PM PST
by
Dryman
("FREE THE LONG FORM!")
To: RowdyFFC
I have, in the same court where she had her rear end handed to her in GA. She has submitted some of the strangest looking, non-conforming pleadings I have ever seen in Federal Court.
The point is that when you are making an argument in court you need to conform to the rules (both Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the local rules of the district court you are in). It's not a trivial point. You want your argument to stand out - by submitting an unfocused, non-conforming series of pleadings and drawing more attention to herself then to her arguments - she weakens her position. I have seen her cite dynamic websites by referencing the URL, as evidence. What's next - Wikipedia? The attached document in this latest effort (the reference to Equatorial Guinea) is no better than that. As evidence, on its face it has no more credibility than a Wikipedia entry.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-123 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson