Is it my contention that the vast majority of biblical scholars disagree with [you and] literal creationism.
Try to read the statement correctly and stop wasting everyone else’s time.
==Is it my contention that the vast majority of biblical scholars disagree with [you and] literal creationism.
First, if you knew anything at all about biblical interpretation, you would know that the historical-grammatical method is different than biblical literalism. The vast majority of biblical scholars (to include biblical creationists) employ the historical-grammatical method to arrive at original intent, whereas I have never even heard of a biblical scholar that employs a strictly literal interpretation of scripture. That’s not to say that they don’t exist, but if any do exist, they are so rare I have never even heard of them. Indeed, even most old earth creationists use the historical-grammatical approach in virtually all other books EXCEPT Genesis...which they tend to throw out in deference to the ever-shifting opinions of mere mortals (so long as they are dressed up in white lab coats.