snip: I don’t know what you are trying to prove here but the field of geology was very primitive 150 years ago and Darwin was not a geologist. Further his geologic interpretations were heavily influenced by his friend and mentor, Charles Lyell, a creationist.
Spirited: Logically, Darwin’s theory must cancel itself out in accordance with the demands of materialistic empiricism (naturalism) which emphatically declares that only the sensory-material realm exists. This means that the immaterial realm, the realm of mind (reason, conscience, memory, etc), presuppositions, assumptions, morality, ideas, truth, natural law, laws of logic, theories, etc. must be denied. In keeping with this nonsense, materialists (using their minds, btw) stupidly proclaim that man is ‘nothing but’ chemical and/or neuronological reactions, robots, and other such stupidity. When we deny the obvious, as do materialist empiricists, we become stupid and depraved.
Either the immaterial exists, thus allowing us to know about Darwin’s immaterial theory or it does not, which logically means that robotic-man can know nothing, for he has no mind withwhich to know anything, let alone reason about it.
And this goes for you, Natural Law. When you attack God Guns and Guts, you are not doing so from within the parameters of the naturalist-worldview straitjacket which you paradoxically hold as true but rather from within the worldview of creationists, which you paradoxically deride as superstition.
Paradoxically, I am not attacking GGG, I am defending the teachings of the Roman Catholic Church which holds that the Bible is not and was never intended to be a science text book and does not attempt to explain how God created the universe and everything in it, only to affirm that He did.