Could the attorneys here on Free Republic please help explain what is going on here?
An honest man would be **HONORED** to promptly provide **all** the information related to his natural born status. He would be **PLEASED** to promptly prove that he was eligible to be president and Commander in Chief of our troops. With a nod of his head to his secretary and about $50 would do this for anyone ...even a nut!
What do Obama’s actions say about his honesty and honor?
What do Obama’s actions say about the honor and honesty of those who defend him?
To my knowledge no Obama defender has ever answered the above two questions. It will be interesting to see if they do so on this thread.
Walter Fitzpatrick is a Patriot who takes his oath to “protect and defend the constitution of the United States” seriously as should all who have taken this oath. I admire his commitment.
I am confused.
If it is determined that Obama was not born in Hawaii, but in Kenya. How can he be accused of treason? If he was not a natural born citizen, or a naturalized citizen - he is an illegal alien.
Like the choir director at Rev. Wright’s church and the assorted Illinois politicians and bureaucrats who have “gone missing” I would watch his back.
Having not watched the video, what charges are being sought?
He does a wonderful job of making Obama's opponents look like unhinged crazies, frothing at the mouth. That's probably why the news gave him air time.
I see that WVLT News has requested a response from Barry, but they - like all others who question him - will only hear the chirping of crickets.
Could the attorneys here on Free Republic please help explain what is going on here?
Tennessee Code 40-12-104. - Application to testify by person having knowledge of commission of offense. —
(a) Any person having knowledge or proof of the commission of a public offense triable or indictable in the county may testify before the grand jury.
(b) The person having knowledge or proof shall appear before the foreman. The person may also submit the sworn affidavits of others whose testimony the person wishes to have considered.
(c) The person shall designate two (2) grand jurors who shall, with the foreman, comprise a panel to determine whether the knowledge warrants investigation by the grand jury. The panel may consult the district attorney general or the court for guidance in making its determination. The majority decision of the panel shall be final and shall be promptly communicated to the person along with reasons for the action taken.
(d) Submission of an affidavit which the person knows to be false in any material regard shall be punishable as perjury. An affiant who permits submission of a false affidavit, knowing it to be false in any material regard, is guilty of perjury. Any person subsequently testifying before the grand jury as to any material fact known by the person to be false is guilty of perjury.
[Acts 1978, ch. 727, § 1; modified; T.C.A., § 40-1626; Acts 1995, ch. 213, §§ 1-4.]