Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: wendy1946; B-Chan
The true main age of dinosaurs would have been several thousand or a few tens of thousands of years back

I forget--what's your explanation for why, if dinosaurs are no older than, say, mammoths, we find entire mammoth bodies preserved, along with their stomach contents, while we only find bones and fragments of fossilized soft tissue for dinosaurs?

77 posted on 12/02/2009 1:13:24 PM PST by Ha Ha Thats Very Logical
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]


To: Ha Ha Thats Very Logical
we find entire mammoth bodies preserved, along with their stomach contents

Frozen, weren't they? I don't believe the controversial dinosaur soft tissue was discovered in such a state.

78 posted on 12/02/2009 1:16:34 PM PST by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]

To: Ha Ha Thats Very Logical

They just found a mummified hadrosaur and are in the process of going over him with that big MRI machine in LA. That’s not good enough for some reason?


86 posted on 12/02/2009 2:14:47 PM PST by wendy1946
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson