“Evolution has failed to predict anything
That statement is incorrect ...Darwin demonstrated that many orchid flowers had evolved elaborate structures by natural selection in order to facilitate cross-pollination. He suggested that orchids and their insect pollinators evolved by interacting with one another over many generations, a process referred to as coevolution.
One particular example illustrates Darwins powerful insight. He studied dried specimens of Angraecum sesquipedale, an orchid native to Madagascar. The white flower of this orchid has a foot-long (30 cm) tubular spur with a small drop of nectar at its base. Darwin claimed that this orchid had been pollinated by a moth with a foot-long tongue. He noted, however, that his statement has been ridiculed by some entomologists. And indeed, around the turn of the century, a Madagascan moth with a one-foot-long tongue was discovered. Apparently, the moths tongue uncoils to sip the nectar of A. sesquipedale as it cross-pollinates the flowers.
http://science.jrank.org/pages/5389/Pollination-History-pollination-studies.html
It called for gradual change which is not in evidence anywhere on Earth. Zero transitional evidence Zip, nada!
This statement is also incorrect.
Why does the creationist/i.d crowed keep asking for the evidence when it is here. All you have to do is go to a museum and see it for yourself. You can take a look at Australopithecus, Homo habilis, Homo erectus, and Homo sapiens and see the clear transtion.
Wrong again!
Darwin’s fanciful ideas proved nothing but that he could imagine almost anything. He had no ‘insight’ but his co-religionist propagators were happy to simply agree with him, and you in your visible inclination accept that as insight.
That’s all there ever is to evolution: consensus of imaginative, fanciful ‘suggestions’ that somehow become ‘fact’ when printed.