If Huck were a Buddhist, would you label our so-called attacks on Huck anti-Buddhist; if Huck was an atheist would they be labelled as anti-secular?
C’mon get a life. Just because Huck is a Christian doesn’t mean he can hide behind his Christian faith or that his critics are lambasting him based on his Christian faith.
I have been a poster at FR for several months. 95% of the posters are rational and intelligent and know enough to focus on what is important in any story which is the event itself.
Simply, Huck caused Clemmons to be put back on the streets. Clemmons shot and killed 4 police officers (they found a dead police officer’s gun on Clemmon’s person after he was killed). Huck didn’t pull the trigger, but he allowed a person who should have been still incarcerated back on the streets.
You argue we shouldn’t hold that against Huck. Well in the real world we might not, but this is hardcore politics, baby, and in hardcore politics, this is definitely political in terms of any Presidential aspirations Huck has because it goes to his judgment, the quality of his decisions and to his political savvy. And that is highly relevant regardless of who the presidential aspirant is.
I am for FAIRNESS. And it is UNFAIR how the right is constantly attacking Huckabee over this. He did not free the man. He did not shoot the cops. People’s reactions on the right are mainly to shoot down a political opponent at the expense of others they like better. I don’t consider that a true Christian motivation.
I would stick up for fairness for every person, no matter what their religion. We’re all equal in God’s eyes: SINNERS.