[ohioWfan]

Here is where it gets really tricky for the BushBot/GWB-lovers Rabs, they can either go for the kneejerk “you’re just a Bush-hater” reaction (which is as close to being programmed into their DNA as breathing, lol)

You know, some day, mk, I would like to see you make your case without the ad hominem, spurious personal attacks. If you get to that point, perhaps we could have a serious discussion of the issues.

Is that even a remote possibility?

[mkjessup]

You know, some day, mk, I would like to see you make your case without the ad hominem, spurious personal attacks. If you get to that point, perhaps we could have a serious discussion of the issues.

Oh grow up fer gawdsakes. I made the following observation:

Here is where it gets really tricky for the BushBot/GWB-lovers Rabs, they can either go for the kneejerk “you’re just a Bush-hater” reaction (which is as close to being programmed into their DNA as breathing, lol)

And YOU saw a convenient excuse to start your usual whining and wailing because someone said something less than complimentary about "those individuals who express great affection and devotion to former President George W. Bush" ( TRANSLATION: groveling, genuflecting BUSHBOTS who elevate a mere mortal to something just below sainthood.)

Your problem (and the problem of every Bush-worshiper) is that you are unable to refute the facts that Rabscuttle385 stated in his post # 192. That is why you crank up that old wah-wah "ad hominem, spurious personal attacks" refrain because you don't have what it takes to defend your idol from historical fact. All you can do is whine.

I would think that someone who idolizes GWB as you do would at least make an attempt to defend his illusory 'legacy'.