Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: metmom
I recall learning that geotropism exerts the stronger influence that phototropism.

Assuming you meant, learned it in school, in your younger years, let me ask you this:

Were they correct? You were also told that the Universe was infinite (I assume), then you were told it was Finite (after discovery of the big bang wave). Which is true?

We are arguing that scientists of the past may have been misinformed ( like, say, Darwin) and yet you stick to a teaching that may be just as untrue.

Matter of fact, if you look at nature around you, you will see that the Sun is the main force of growth, and that gravity more likely plays only a tiny little part in a plant 'figuring' out which way to grow.

What I'm saying is that if one wants to imply that plants 'understand' and 'use' gravity, (pretty intelligent thing, I'd say), then OK. But, they also know if they don't follow, or grow towards the Sun, they will die.

139 posted on 12/03/2009 4:44:53 PM PST by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies ]


To: UCANSEE2

When the seed planted underground sprouts, it responds to gravity before it can respond to light, because it hasn’t been exposed to light yet.

What I’ve seen is that plants bend towards the light but you can make some interesting shaped plants if you lay them on their side, or like with this new way of growing tomato plants, hang them upside down.

What I’ve noticed is that plants respond more strongly to gravity, wanting to grow up, than they do towards sunlight.


145 posted on 12/03/2009 6:04:49 PM PST by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson