Excellent!
Watch the homosexuals do the two step. With Defense of Marriage they went with the states’ rights argument. Now they can dump that and go for civil rights legislation, whatever it takes to push a radical, homosexual agenda onto a vast majority of people who don’t want it.
Sodomites go back into the closet for a circle-jerk BUMP!
Their downfall started with the “Folsom Street Fair” video. Watch SF try to shove the genie back into the bottle and rein in public homo sex acts.
My 2 cents.
If you have ever expressed your disagreement with the homosexual lifestyle you have likely had someone respond: “How does what a person does in the privacy of his home hurt you”? Answer: When what is done in the privacy of one’s home is sanctioned by the government it creates a legitimization for that action or lifestyle that inevitably invades the homes of others through the media – newspapers, TV, movies, the internet – through the schools – requiring students, regardless of religious or moral beliefs, to take classes with the purpose of indoctrinating them with the State’s values – through the law – criminalizing thoughts, words, or actions (Hate Crime Laws) the State deems offensive or intolerant. The truth of this statement is evident to all but the willfully blind.Read More
Freepmail wagglebee or DirtyHarryY2K to subscribe or unsubscribe from the homosexual agenda ping list.
Be sure to click the FreeRepublic homosexual agenda keyword search link for a list of all related articles. We don't ping you to all related articles so be sure to click the previous link to see the latest articles.
Add keywords homosexual agenda to flag FR articles to this ping list.
Too many dissidents not listening to “top officials.” They’re worrying their gay heads off about that.
Probably because God didn’t make humans reproduce homosexually. Going against God is a tall order. No shame in losing that one.
How about threatening to burn a church down? Or threatening to stage a mass gay kiss-in in front a church?
Those worked so well in the past (sarc/)
Which means either that "top public officials" don't have kids and don't have a clue, or else they have kids but just don't give a flying flip.
New possibility here (hear me out):
Liberal groups incl. gov't. bureaucracies founded on liberal shibboleths (such as those instituted by Lyndon Bastard Johnson) make local pols dance for the money. They offer fungible, "this-can-all-go-away" marginal dollars for purposes the donors want funded, conditionally on the pols' performing as instructed (i.e. the pols are bribed, but we don't use that word because they're all fine fellows and their intentions are all the best).
So when the NGO's asked the pols before, about these SSM issues, the pols told them what they wanted to hear. It'll all be swell, do your thing, rock the house, party 'til you puke ...... did you bring the check?
The pols told them what they wanted to hear, and then they ...... absquatulated.
They can't even stay bought any more. Isn't that sad?
“So, the Courage Campaign sent a note to its supporters Monday calling for “for more research and time to change hearts and minds before returning to the ballot.””
Translated: “We’ll have to let the judges do our dirty work.”
“”The biggest hangup people have is that right wing has done a very good job of telling people that somehow children will be affected” should same sex marriage become legal.”
It’s not “somehow children will be affected”, it’s “children will be affected”, as is now the case in Mass, where they use the gay marriage law to justify no opt-out for parents when it’s time for “Heather has Two Mommies”. It is fear based on facts and the gays made it VERY EASY for us.
Why don't the homosexuals just live together like half of the nations heterosexual couples?
It is all about access to other peoples’ children, special rights and privileges, and full benefits for deviants or any others, claiming to perform homosexual acts. Keep in mind, all one has to do is make the claim and presto, you have the special rights and privileges.