Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CottShop; betty boop; tacticalogic; Alamo-Girl; neverdem; metmom; GodGunsGuts
And, if anyone wants to claim that the "AGW CO2 lie" is harmless, consider this:

Even the Supreme Court of the USA has been so misled that it has issued an opinion that, on its face, is scandalously wrong!

51 posted on 11/30/2009 9:54:44 AM PST by TXnMA ("Allah": Satan's current alias...!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]


To: TXnMA

Exactly, the courts (and yes, even the supreme court) are no longer objective, but rather are now political legislators with hte power to enforce laws based o ntheir subjective interpretations- Sandra Day O’Connor’s opinion about ‘seperation of Church and state’ proved that she is NOT fit to sit hte bench, showign that she is more concerned abotu agenda than she is about upholding her sworn duty to objectively rule. She legislated sentiments concerning ‘seperation of church and state’ by claiming anyone in government who observes religion in public is trying to ‘force or coerce’ others to do so as well- to ‘establish a religion to the exclusion of other religions’ which oif course is an assinine claim

The supreme court has been scandalous for a great many years now- and this global warmign issue will prove to be just an ongoing perversion of the judicial system.

Judge Jones also proved his unnabashed bias when he wrote the brief against ID in the dover trial- proving conclusively that he wasm ore interested in agenda than he is abotu justice and truth- His brief/opinion was a travesty of justice, which of course the left immediately praised and called ‘brilliant’- but anyoen with an iota of objectivity and commojn sense can see he severely overstepped his authority and duty to objectivity by stating the assinine biased crap that he did- and just for hte record, his opinion was almost a carbon copy of the ACLU’s ‘opinion’ on the ruling- prewritten, just wating for the ‘verdict’ (lynching)


52 posted on 11/30/2009 10:09:08 AM PST by CottShop (Scientific belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

To: TXnMA; Alamo-Girl; tacticalogic; CottShop; metmom; GodGunsGuts; xzins
Even the Supreme Court of the USA has been so misled that it has issued an opinion that, on its face, is scandalously wrong!

Unfortunately dear brother in Christ, the Justices of the Supreme Court are not trained scientists. Nor was Judge Jones....

The point being that science and its controversies should never be within the purview of courts of law for their adjudication. Only a person from Mars could argue that would be a "good thing."

54 posted on 11/30/2009 12:00:53 PM PST by betty boop (Without God man neither knows which way to go, nor even understands who he is. —Pope Benedict XVI)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson