That sounds fair enough, but there is one problem. What you are asking is that she merely pay you lip service over a past event. What she say about the past bailout is highly meaningless, what she says about the future is all important. I suggest that you do not put so much stock in lip service and examine her past fiscal track record in the State of Alaska. Also pay attention to her vision of the future and compare it to her Alaskan track record.
Because she supported the bankster bailout in the past, can we believe her if she tells that she would not in the future?
I don't think so... not without some explanation.
Somebody who doesn't understand that capitalism, in order to work, requires failure, has no business as my President. Maybe she does understand. If so, she should explain her past position.