Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Windows 7 Sales Up 234% Compared to Windows Vista
DailyTech ^ | November 6, 2009 | DailyTech

Posted on 11/27/2009 8:09:40 PM PST by SmokingJoe

Windows 7 sales are up and Microsoft is please with the success of its Windows 7 upgrade.

While Apple seems to be content with “going negative” when it comes to commercials touting its computing products, Microsoft has taken a different route with Windows 7. Apple has focused more on bashing Windows 7 (and the faults of its predecessors) rather than focus on the main strengths of the OS X platform. Microsoft, on the other hand, has created positive ads which tout the new features in Windows 7.

It appears that Microsoft’s positive route — along with relatively positive reviews — have led to some rather impressive sales numbers for the latest and greatest from Redmond, Washington. According to NPD Group, boxed unit sales for Windows 7 during the first week of availability were up 234% compared to it’s predecessor, Windows Vista. However, due to an increased use of discounts – such as $50 and $100 Home Premium and Professional upgrades for general consumers, along with $30 Home Premium and Professional upgrades for students – meant that dollar sales were up just 82%, which still isn’t too shabby at all for Microsoft

(Excerpt) Read more at digitaltrends.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Technical
KEYWORDS: microsoft; vista; windows7
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last

1 posted on 11/27/2009 8:09:41 PM PST by SmokingJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SmokingJoe

Win 7 is GOOD!
Win Vista is CRAP!

That is the difference....


2 posted on 11/27/2009 8:11:46 PM PST by Bobalu (I AM JIM THOMPSON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmokingJoe

Gates & Co. finally got it right, or at least much less wrong. Vista was a disaster. Microsoft would get valentines from IT departments all over the globe if it would provide a way to do automated upgrades from XP directly to Windows 7. Presently, XP has to go to Vista before it can go to Windows 7.


3 posted on 11/27/2009 8:13:17 PM PST by HiTech RedNeck (I am in America but not of America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bobalu

Good to know, I just purchased a new desktop with the Windows 7...can’t wait to get the box open and see how it works. Have Vista on my laptop....my daughter says it is very good compared to her laptop with vista...wonder why?


4 posted on 11/27/2009 8:15:10 PM PST by GrannyK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SmokingJoe

I upgraded to Windows 7 a few weeks ago. It’s MUCH better then Vista, goes much more smoothly. Doesn’t crash like Vista did.


5 posted on 11/27/2009 8:16:43 PM PST by Sarah Barracuda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GrannyK

Rest assured!
You are in good shape with Win 7!
:-)

No Worries....


6 posted on 11/27/2009 8:16:56 PM PST by Bobalu (I AM JIM THOMPSON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SmokingJoe

The existence of Windows 7 proves that even Microsoft was “going negative” on Vista.


7 posted on 11/27/2009 8:17:01 PM PST by PressurePoint (See you in the unemployment line, Barack!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmokingJoe; rdb3; Calvinist_Dark_Lord; GodGunsandGuts; CyberCowboy777; Salo; Bobsat; JosephW; ...

8 posted on 11/27/2009 8:17:28 PM PST by ShadowAce (Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sarah Barracuda

What kind of prices are you guys paying for 7?


9 posted on 11/27/2009 8:18:20 PM PST by headstamp 2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

Windows 7 is definitely a winner. As for IT departments, why can’t they just do a clean install of Windows 7? Wipe out all that old Vista/XP crap once and for all.


10 posted on 11/27/2009 8:19:05 PM PST by SamAdams76 (I am 29 days away from outliving Lefty Frizzell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76

The awkward part is keeping all the applications and settings that were on the computer.


11 posted on 11/27/2009 8:19:55 PM PST by HiTech RedNeck (I am in America but not of America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SmokingJoe
The biggest problem with Vista was that the operating was WAY too ahead of its time when it came out in early 2007. It wasn't until around February 2008, when desktop and laptop machines with dual-core CPU's and 3-4 GB of RAM became common, that Vista finally became reasonably usable.
12 posted on 11/27/2009 8:24:18 PM PST by RayChuang88 (FairTax: America's economic cure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmokingJoe

I had Vista, on a Dell E520, 3.04 ghz cpu, and upped the ram to 3gb (tried 4, before finding out 32 bit cannot handle it). And while I thank God for it, it was quite slower than XP (i dual booted), no matter how much i tweaked it. But the Lord upgraded us (i am part of a faith ministry) to a Sony, 2.8ghz, 3gb ram with XP, and while its loaded, it is faster.

I wonder what the advantage of W/7 is? I would like to see more ability to customize, like in Firefox.


13 posted on 11/27/2009 8:25:24 PM PST by daniel1212 ("hear the word of the gospel, and believe." (Acts 15:7))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RayChuang88

When “ahead of its time” means “bloatware that founders a lot of the hardware common to offices, labs, and homes” that is rather faint praise for hasta-la-Vista.


14 posted on 11/27/2009 8:26:21 PM PST by HiTech RedNeck (I am in America but not of America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

For older and less capable machines I recommend dual-booting with a choice of Ubuntu/XP.

For new boxes I recommend Win7!!!


15 posted on 11/27/2009 8:34:06 PM PST by Bobalu (I AM JIM THOMPSON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: All
A little off topic, but computer related. What is the word on USB 3 ? When is it going to be offered on new machines, worth waiting for?
Fixing to buy new laptop and new desktop with Windows 7 in near future.
16 posted on 11/27/2009 8:37:51 PM PST by The Cajun (Mind numbed robot , ditto-head, Hannitized, Levinite)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck
The problem with Windows Vista was that Microsoft assumed people were going to use dual-core CPU's and have more than 2 GB of RAM installed on their systems. This was not a common configuration in early 2007, and as a result installing Vista on older hardware proved to be a frustrating experience.

It wasn't until early 2008 when dual-core CPU machines with 3 to 4 GB of RAM became widely available that performance issues finally went away.

17 posted on 11/27/2009 8:40:28 PM PST by RayChuang88 (FairTax: America's economic cure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76

I work in a hospital, and we are probably at least three to five years away from moving off of Windows XP.

The problem is, there are a huge number of applications used in the medical environment, and all of them need to be extensively tested and validated, because many of them have to co-exist on the same platform.

It is a gargantuan task.


18 posted on 11/27/2009 8:50:16 PM PST by rlmorel (We are traveling "The Road to Serfdom".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: headstamp 2

The best price I got was $30 for Win 7 Pro through the academic discount program! I paid another $14 to get a back up CD of Win 7 (in addition to a download).
http://windows7.digitalriver.com/store/mswpus/en_US/DisplayHomePage?resid=I1ZVYAoBAkYAABOZi78AAAAS&rests=1259383785146


19 posted on 11/27/2009 8:50:49 PM PST by ransomnote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: RayChuang88
The biggest problem with Vista was that the operating was WAY too ahead of its time when it came out in early 2007. It wasn't until around February 2008, when desktop and laptop machines with dual-core CPU’s and 3-4 GB of RAM became common, that Vista finally became reasonably usable”

Pretty much.
PC makers were selling some Vista PC’s in 2007 with 512 MB of RAM.
No way you are gonna get any good usability experience with a 512 MB Vista PC.
Then there was the matter of device drives, which were not available for a lot of devices for Vista.
Then there was the annoying UAC. Most of those issues have been fixed with SP2 and current more powerful computers.

20 posted on 11/27/2009 8:52:39 PM PST by SmokingJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson