Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Wishing Happy Christmas 'Could Be An Obscenity' Warns Bishop [Time For Anglicans To Quit]
Telegraph(UK) ^ | November 28th 2009

Posted on 11/27/2009 6:22:54 PM PST by Steelfish

Wishing Happy Christmas 'Could Be An Obscenity' Warns Bishop Wishing people a Happy Christmas could be seen as an "insult" or even an "obscenity" as not everyone is in a position to celebrate, a bishop has warned.

By Stephen Adams 27 Nov 2009

Many can't share the manufactured bonhomie of Christmas, say bishop Y

The Right Reverend Humphrey Southern, the Bishop of Repton, said it was a "hollow" greeting to make to those who were suffering. People should not "simply make a cocoon of happiness for ourselves and our loved ones" at Christmas, he said.

Writing in the monthly Derby diocese newsletter, he said: "This is the 'Happy Christmas' month. Yet to many that greeting will be hollow, coming as an insult, or even an obscenity."

The bishop, 49, went on to ask: "What can 'Happy Christmas' mean in a family whose father has been killed in a military operation in Afghanistan that fewer and fewer people understand (still less support)?

"How do you wish 'Happy Christmas' to a community in the Indian Ocean who can probably count on the fingers of a couple of hands the number of Christmases they will see before their home disappears under water, victim to global warming?

(Excerpt) Read more at telegraph.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: christmas; haveamerrychristmas; merrychristmas; merrymerrychristmas; poor; poverty; reverandscroooge; waronchristmas
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 last
To: The Grammarian; RonF

Nor is it “autonomous”...


41 posted on 11/30/2009 10:36:34 AM PST by TaxRelief (Walmart: Keeping my family on-budget since 1993.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: TaxRelief

They seem autonomous to me. None of the members of the Anglican Communion seem particularly responsible to either each other or to a central authority. There is no central authority that can set rules for any of the members. How do you think that “autonomous” is not an appropriate descriptor?


42 posted on 11/30/2009 11:22:29 AM PST by RonF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: TaxRelief; RonF
"The Anglican Communion is an international association of national Anglican churches. There is no single "Anglican Church" with universal juridical authority as each national or regional church has full autonomy"--Wikipedia, "Anglican Communion"

See also here.

43 posted on 11/30/2009 6:49:41 PM PST by The Grammarian (Hail to the (Groveller in) Chief!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: The Grammarian

Quoting wikipedia is like quoting my tech-savvy teen. Pointless.


44 posted on 12/01/2009 3:58:03 AM PST by TaxRelief (Walmart: Keeping my family on-budget since 1993.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: TaxRelief
Actually, as any librarian will tell you, Wikipedia is an acceptable start to any research. It's not an acceptable finish, though.

Hence why I quoted anglican.org as well. Which you ignored.

45 posted on 12/01/2009 5:55:01 AM PST by The Grammarian (Hail to the (Groveller in) Chief!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: The Grammarian

What religion are you? I want to explain this from your prospective.


46 posted on 12/01/2009 10:51:27 AM PST by TaxRelief (Walmart: Keeping my family on-budget since 1993.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: TaxRelief
What religion are you? I want to explain this from your prospective.

It's in my profile. I'm Christian, and one of the "people called Methodist"--whose founder was an Anglican priest, I might add.

If you're going to tell me that the Anglican Communion is not autonomous because each individual national church answers to the Lord Jesus, that's really more an eschatological statement--and we're talking church polity here.

47 posted on 12/01/2009 3:27:29 PM PST by The Grammarian (Hail to the (Groveller in) Chief!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson