This is what I got from your reply. We don't know all the facts, something must have happened to have the charges preferred, we'll know once the Article 32 or court martial is over.
Yeah, that sounds about right. I wouldn't be trying to get upset over things that no one fully knows or understands yet. That's jumping the gun on the matter.
It's different when you know that an Administration is pushing something like "Obamacare" in which you know what the situation is, that is being promoted. In this case, there's a lot that we don't know yet.
What you and I don't know can make us look stupid if we get upset over something and facts come out later that make it clear that we were wrong. That's the problem that one encounters with these kinds of things.
Sure, I would like to get in there and know all the details and facts, and then I wouldn't be "in the dark" about it, but it's not going to work that way.
AND so, people here can speculate and discuss things, but just don't get upset over something you don't know for sure. There are a lot of other things that we do know about this administration that is documented absolutely without doubt. I would caution about getting upset about this until all is known about it.
LOL, Star Traveler. I’ve never been worried about appearing “stupid” when it comes to giving our accused military the benefit of the doubt, especially for something this trivial. I see a pattern. I call it as I see it.
If I get “upset”, fret, worry about how our accused military (on the ground) are treated, whether they can get a fair trial without spending a fortune, whether the deck is stacked against them because of the mindset of NCIS, the prosecutorial branch, and the military brass........it’s because I’ve seen a pattern.