To: xzins
You can’t prove evolution either. Both deal with the unobservable, unrepeatable past. They are historical sciences, and historical sciences depend on “multiple competing hypothesis.” And from my stand point, the argument from Creation/ID wins the competition hands down.
To: GodGunsGuts
You can’t prove evolution either. Both deal with the unobservable, unrepeatable past. They are historical sciences, and historical sciences depend on “multiple competing hypothesis.” And from my stand point, the argument from Creation/ID wins the competition hands down.A film can present a "competing hypothesis", and still be "religious propaganda". The are not mutually exclusive.
57 posted on
11/26/2009 7:50:37 AM PST by
tacticalogic
("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
To: GodGunsGuts
This statement shows that you lack a basic understanding of science.
I.D. currently has not testable hypothesis.
63 posted on
11/26/2009 8:24:11 AM PST by
Ira_Louvin
(Go tell them people lost in sin, Theres a higher power ,They need not fear the works of men.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson